首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >Commute responses to employment decentralization: Anticipated versus actual mode choice behaviors of new town employees in Kunming, China
【24h】

Commute responses to employment decentralization: Anticipated versus actual mode choice behaviors of new town employees in Kunming, China

机译:通勤应对就业分散化:中国昆明市新城镇雇员的预期模式选择行为与实际模式选择行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study examines workers' mode-choice responses to a typical job decentralization policy implemented in China's urban development - government job relocation (GJR) to new towns in the urban periphery. Broadly, the literature suggests that job decentralization tends to increase car commuting; however, little is known about the effects of China's GJR initiatives on individuals' commuting mode choices. Using Kunming as a case study, this study examines how workers' commuting mode choices have shifted in response to the GJR policy. Our study analyzes two travel survey datasets that span the job relocation process: (1) stated preference (SP) data on workers' anticipated mode choices after a move of workplace to a planned new town; and (2) revealed preference (RP) data on workers' actual choices of commuting mode after their jobs were moved. The findings suggest that after job relocation, workers' actual commuting modes shift from more sustainable modes towards cars. The determinants of workers' mode choices differ substantially between the hypothetical and actual setting of job relocation. The anticipated mode choices are largely determined by socio-demographic characteristics whereas the actual mode choices are strongly influenced by travel time and housing locations. The evidence from this study offers two important implications for future planning practice of job decentralization. First, planners and policy-makers should be skeptical about the transportation benefits of job decentralization. Second, while SP surveys can assist planners to predict individuals' mode-choice responses, the robustness of SP results should be carefully assessed before translating into the evidence base for informing job decentralization policy-makings. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究考察了工人对中国城市发展中实施的典型工作分权政策的模式选择反应-政府工作转移(GJR)到城市外围的新城镇。从广义上讲,文献表明工作分散化倾向于增加通勤。但是,对于中国的GJR举措对个人通勤方式选择的影响知之甚少。这项研究以昆明为例,研究了工人的通勤方式选择是如何根据GJR政策而改变的。我们的研究分析了横跨工作转移过程的两个旅行调查数据集:(1)关于将工作场所转移到计划中的新城镇后工人的预期模式选择的陈述偏好(SP)数据; (2)揭示了有关工人转移工作后实际选择的通勤方式的偏好(RP)数据。研究结果表明,在工作岗位转移后,工人的实际通勤模式从更可持续的模式转向了汽车。工人模式选择的决定因素在工作搬迁的假设设置与实际设置之间存在很大差异。预期的模式选择很大程度上取决于社会人口统计学特征,而实际的模式选择则受旅行时间和居住地点的强烈影响。这项研究的证据为未来的工作权力下放规划实践提供了两个重要的启示。首先,计划者和政策制定者应该对工作分散化的运输收益持怀疑态度。其次,尽管SP调查可以帮助计划者预测个人的模式选择反应,但在转换SP的稳健性之前,应先评估其结果的稳健性,然后再将其转化为为工作分权决策提供依据的证据基础。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号