首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >The evolving market entry strategy: A comparative study of Southwest and JetBlue
【24h】

The evolving market entry strategy: A comparative study of Southwest and JetBlue

机译:不断发展的市场进入策略:西南航空与捷蓝航空的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper studies the market entry patterns and evolving strategies adopted by Southwest and JetBlue. Based on the quarterly data from US T100 Domestic Segment database, we trace Southwest's successful market entries from 1993 to 2016, and those of JetBlue from 2000 to 2016, and estimate a set of discrete choice models to investigate the factors that may attract or deter route entries by Southwest and JetBlue. These factors reflect route distance, traffic demand, market power of the carriers, route competition, and connectivity and traffic concentration at endpoint airports, etc. The paper also examines the similarity and dissimilarity between Southwest and JetBlue with respect to the effects of these factors on their entry decisions, and how their route entry decisions have evolved over time. Our results indicate that both Southwest and JetBlue are more likely to enter routes where they have higher market share in terms of traffic and connectivity at endpoint airports, but they are less likely to enter routes involving endpoint airports with higher concentration in either traffic or connectivity. While Southwest appears to prefer routes with short to medium distance in the 1990s, it has started to target longer distance routes since 2000. JetBlue has consistently preferred longer distance routes. While the number of legacy rivals on a given route may deter market entry by Southwest, it does not appear to have any significant effect on the entry decisions by JetBlue. Moreover, the presence of other LCCs may have deterred the market entry by Southwest during the 1993-1999 period, and by JetBlue during the 2000-2006 period, its entry-deterrence effects has been becoming less important as the two airlines continue their growth and market expansion. The results further suggest that Southwest has continued to be hesitant to enter routes that have asymmetric traffic volume at endpoint airports, but it has become more drawn to routes with broader connections and higher traffic at endpoint airports as it moves into the business passenger segment.
机译:本文研究了西南航空和捷蓝航空采用的市场进入模式和发展策略。根据美国T100国内细分市场数据库的季度数据,我们跟踪了西南航空从1993年至2016年以及捷蓝航空从2000年至2016年的成功市场进入,并估计了一组离散选择模型,以研究可能吸引或阻止航线的因素西南航空公司和捷蓝航空的作品。这些因素反映了航线距离,交通需求,承运人的市场支配力,航线竞争以及终点机场的连通性和交通集中度等。本文还就这些因素对西南航空和捷蓝航空的影响进行了研究,研究了它们之间的异同。他们的进入决定,以及他们的路线进入决定是如何随着时间演变的。我们的结果表明,西南航空和捷蓝航空都更有可能进入在端点机场的交通和连通性方面具有较高市场份额的航线,但它们不太可能进入涉及交通或连通性较高的端点机场的航线。虽然在1990年代,西南航空似乎更喜欢短途到中距离的航线,但自2000年以来,它已开始瞄准更长距离的航线。JetBlue一直以来都偏爱长途航线。虽然给定路线上的传统竞争对手的数量可能会阻止西南航空进入市场,但对捷蓝航空的进入决定似乎没有任何重大影响。此外,其他低成本航空公司的存在可能阻止了西南航空在1993-1999年进入市场,而捷蓝航空在2000-2006年进入市场,由于这两家航空公司继续发展,其进入威慑作用已变得不那么重要。市场扩展。结果进一步表明,西南航空仍然不愿进入端点机场流量不对称的航线,但随着它进入商务旅客段,它越来越倾向于连接范围更广,端点机场流量更高的航线。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transportation Research》 |2020年第2期|682-695|共14页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位

    Embry Riddle Aeronaut Univ David B OMaley Coll Business 1 Aerosp Blvd Daytona Beach FL 32114 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Market entry; Low-cost airlines; Evolving strategy;

    机译:市场进入;低成本航空公司;不断发展的策略;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号