...
首页> 外文期刊>Transport policy >Moving past the sustainable perspectives on transport: An attempt to mobilise critical urban transport studies with the right to the city
【24h】

Moving past the sustainable perspectives on transport: An attempt to mobilise critical urban transport studies with the right to the city

机译:超越交通的可持续发展观点:试图动员具有城市权的重要城市交通研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The contemporary urban transport debate is increasingly versed in terms of "sustainable" development, placing social and environmental issues on the agenda. However, despite their heterogeneity, sustainable perspectives seldom engage with the explicitly political issues that shape the relationship between transport and urban development. In this paper, we propose to re-connect urban transport with political economic considerations, and thus to mobilise and strengthen "critical" perspectives on urban transport. We develop a framework for studying transport policies inspired by Henri Lefebvre's conceptualisation of "the right to the city". The framework is illustrated with the empirical example of a "pedestrianisation" project in Brussels, a salient case of a "sustainable" transport policy. We demonstrate how ostensibly progressive intentions in terms of challenging local mobility paradigms do not necessarily translate into participative and transformative practices. Instead, they often embrace the established policy-makers, leave local power relations largely unaltered, support elite entrepreneurial agendas, and obfuscate the socio-spatially uneven landscapes of contemporary cities. We thus highlight the urgency of re-politicising urban transport theory and practice by seeking and revealing political economic choices, contradictions and conflicts that underpin transport policies interwoven with urban development dynamics.
机译:当代的城市交通辩论越来越精通“可持续”发展,把社会和环境问题放在了议程上。然而,尽管它们具有异质性,但可持续发展的观点却很少涉及明显的政治问题,而这些政治问题决定了交通与城市发展之间的关系。在本文中,我们建议将城市交通与政治经济因素重新联系起来,从而动员和加强对城市交通的“批判”观点。我们根据Henri Lefebvre对“城市权”的概念化启发,开发了一个研究运输政策的框架。该框架以布鲁塞尔“行人专用化”项目的经验示例进行了说明,这是“可持续”运输政策的一个突出案例。我们展示了在挑战性的本地流动性范式上表面上的进步意图不一定转化为参与性和变革性实践。相反,他们经常拥抱既定的政策制定者,很大程度上不改变地方权力关系,支持精英企业家议程,并模糊了当代城市在社会空间上参差不齐的景观。因此,我们通过寻求和揭示政治经济学的选择,矛盾和冲突来强调城市运输理论和实践的紧迫性,这些选择,矛盾和冲突是与城市发展动态交织在一起的运输政策的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号