首页> 外文期刊>Time >How Tospend The Stimulus
【24h】

How Tospend The Stimulus

机译:如何花费刺激

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It's hard to take republican leaders too seriously when they criticize the recovery plans for the economy; it's sort of like those geese criticizing the evacuation plans for US Airways Flight 1549. Their critiques seem even more comical when you see their alternatives. They warn that President Obama's stimulus package will explode the debt-so they want to make George W. Bush's debt-exploding tax cuts permanent. They say Democratic spending plans are full of pork-then they propose an extra $24 billion for the Army Corps of Engineers, the federal equivalent of Oscar Mayer. Let's just say their idea bank could use a bailout.rnBut there have been more serious critiques of the $900 billion-plus American Recovery and Reinvestment Act-from more serious critics. The stimulus smorgasbord does include some head scratchers, like $246 million worth of tax breaks for movie producers to buy film and $1.4 billion for "rural waste-disposal programs." Principled conservatives worry that it's so big, it will institutionalize Big Government; principled liberals worry that it won't be big enough to resuscitate a flatlined economy.
机译:共和党领导人批评经济复苏计划时,很难过分认真。就像那些大雁批评美国航空1549航班的疏散计划一样。当您看到他们的选择时,他们的批评似乎更加可笑。他们警告说,奥巴马总统的经济刺激方案将使债务激增,因此他们希望使乔治·W·布什的债务激增减税政策永久生效。他们说,民主党的支出计划充斥着猪肉,然后他们提议为陆军工程兵团(联邦政府相当于奥斯卡·梅耶尔)追加240亿美元。只是说他们的想法银行可以使用救助方案。但是,更严肃的批评者对9000亿美元以上的《美国复苏和再投资法案》提出了更为严肃的批评。刺激性的大杂烩确实包括一些令人头疼的问题,例如电影制片人购买电影的税收减免额为2.46亿美元,以及“农村废物处置计划”的14亿美元。有原则的保守派担心它太大了,它会使大政府制度化。有原则的自由主义者担心,它的规模不足以恢复扁平化的经济。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Time》 |2009年第6期|20-22|共3页
  • 作者

    MICHAEL GRUNWALD;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号