首页> 外文期刊>Theory and Society >Struggle and solidarity: civic republican elements in Pierre Bourdieu’s political sociology
【24h】

Struggle and solidarity: civic republican elements in Pierre Bourdieu’s political sociology

机译:奋斗与团结:皮埃尔·布迪厄政治社会学中的公民共和主义元素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Pierre Bourdieu developed a theory of democratic politics that is at least as indebted to civic republicanism as to Marxism. He was familiar with the civic republican tradition, and it increasingly influenced both his political interventions and sociological work, especially late in his career. Bourdieu drew above all on Niccolò Machiavelli’s version of republicanism, though the French republican tradition also influenced him via Durkheimian social theory. Three elements of Bourdieu’s work in particular—his concept of field autonomy, his view of interests and universalism, and his understanding of how solidarity is generated and sustained—may be understood, at least in part, as sociological reformulations of republican ideas. By drawing attention to these republican influences, the article aims to show that the conceptual resources which some critics, including Jeffrey C. Alexander, consider indispensable to an adequate theory of democracy are not entirely absent in Bourdieu’s work. On the basis of this reassessment, the article concludes that Bourdieu and Alexander are not as opposed in their thinking about democratic politics as it might first appear.
机译:皮埃尔·布尔迪厄(Pierre Bourdieu)发展了一种民主政治理论,该理论至少与公民共和主义和马克思主义一样重要。他熟悉公民共和党的传统,这一点对他的政治干预和社会学工作都产生了越来越大的影响,尤其是在他的职业生涯后期。布迪厄首先借鉴了尼科洛·马基雅维利(NiccolòMachiavelli)的共和主义,尽管法国共和党的传统也通过涂尔干的社会理论对他产生了影响。特别是布迪厄作品的三个要素,即他的领域自治概念,他对利益和普世主义的看法以及他对如何产生和维持团结的理解,至少可以部分理解为对共和党思想的社会学重构。通过提请注意这些共和党的影响,这篇文章旨在表明,包括杰弗里·亚历山大(Jeffrey C. Alexander)在内的一些评论家认为,在适当的民主理论中必不可少的概念资源在布迪厄的著作中并不完全缺乏。在此重新评估的基础上,文章得出结论,布迪厄和亚历山大在对民主政治的思考中并不像它初次出现时那样受到反对。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号