首页> 外文期刊>Theory and Decision >Are bygones bygones?
【24h】

Are bygones bygones?

机译:过去是过去吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article reports an experiment which tests the principle of separability, i.e. that behaviour in a dynamic choice problem is independent of history and of unreachable eventualities. Although this is a well-known principle of orthodox decision theory and central to conventional economic modelling, it has been questioned on grounds suggested by non-expected utility models of choice under risk and by the psychology of affective influences on risk-taking. Our experimental design, which provides between-subjects tests of separability using three treatments in which the history preceding a decision is manipulated, is inspired by these concerns. We expose separability to a clean and harsh test, but find no evidence that it is violated.
机译:本文报告了一个测试可分离性原理的实验,即动态选择问题中的行为与历史和不可预测的事件无关。尽管这是正统决策理论的众所周知的原理,并且是常规经济建模的核心,但它已受到以下质疑:基于风险下的非预期效用选择模型以及对冒险承担的情感影响心理。我们的实验设计受到这些关注的启发,该实验设计使用三种处理方法(其中处理了决策之前的历史记录)提供了对象间的可分离性测试。我们对可分离性进行了严格而严格的测试,但是没有发现任何违反它的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号