...
首页> 外文期刊>Theory and Decision >Why does myopia decrease the willingness to invest? Is it myopic loss aversion or myopic loss probability aversion?
【24h】

Why does myopia decrease the willingness to invest? Is it myopic loss aversion or myopic loss probability aversion?

机译:为什么近视会降低投资意愿?是近视损失厌恶还是近视损失概率厌恶?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For loss averse investors, a sequence of risky investments looks less attractive if it is evaluated myopically-an effect called myopic loss aversion (MLA). The consequences of this effect have been confirmed in several experiments and its robustness is largely undisputed. The effect's causes, however, have not been thoroughly examined with regard to one important aspect. Due to the construction of the lotteries that were used in the experiments, none of the studies is able to distinguish between MLA and an explanation based on (myopic) loss probability aversion (MLPA). This distinction is important, however, in discussion of the practical relevance and the gen-eralizability of the phenomenon. We designed an experiment that is able to disentangle lottery attractiveness and loss probabilities. Our analysis reveals that mere loss probabilities are not as important in this dynamic context as previous findings in other domains suggest. The results favor the MLA over the MLPA explanation.
机译:对于厌恶损失的投资者而言,如果对其进行近视评估,则一系列风险投资的吸引力似乎会降低,这种效应称为近视损失厌恶(MLA)。这种效应的后果已在几个实验中得到证实,其鲁棒性在很大程度上没有争议。但是,尚未从一个重要方面对影响的原因进行彻底检查。由于实验中使用的彩票的构造,因此没有一项研究能够区分MLA和基于(近视)损失概率规避(MLPA)的解释。但是,在讨论该现象的实际相关性和泛化性时,这一区别很重要。我们设计了一个能够区分彩票吸引力和损失概率的实验。我们的分析表明,在这种动态情况下,仅损失概率并不像其他领域的先前发现那么重要。结果比MLPA解释更倾向于MLA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号