...
首页> 外文期刊>Theory and Decision >The efficiency of crackdowns: a lab-in-the-field experiment in public transportations
【24h】

The efficiency of crackdowns: a lab-in-the-field experiment in public transportations

机译:镇压的效率:公共交通领域的现场实验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The concentration of high-frequency controls in a limited period of time ("crackdowns") constitutes an important feature of many law-enforcement policies around the world. In this paper, we offer a comprehensive investigation on the relative efficiency and effectiveness of various crackdown policies using a lab-in-the-field experiment with real passengers of a public transport service. We introduce a novel game, the daily public transportation game, where subjects have to decide, over many periods, whether to buy or not a ticket knowing that there might be a control. Our results show that (a) concentrated crackdowns are less effective and efficient than random controls; (b) prolonged crackdowns reduce fare-dodging during the period of intense monitoring but induce a burst of fraud as soon as they are withdrawn; (c) pre-announced controls induce more fraud in the periods without control. Overall, we also observe that real fare-dodgers fraud more in the experiment than non-fare-dodgers.
机译:高频控制在有限的时间内集中(“打击”)构成了全球许多执法政策的重要特征。在本文中,我们通过对公共交通服务的实际乘客进行的现场实验,对各种镇压政策的相对效率和有效性进行了全面调查。我们介绍了一种新颖的游戏,即每日的公共交通游戏,在此过程中,受试者必须在很长一段时间内决定是否购买车票,而他们知道这可能会有控制权。我们的结果表明(a)集中镇压的效果和效率低于随机对照; (b)长时间的镇压会减少在严密监视期间的逃票行为,但一旦撤回便会引发欺诈行为; (c)预先宣布的控制措施会在无控制的时期内引发更多欺诈行为。总体而言,我们还观察到,在实际实验中,真正的逃票者比不逃票者更容易欺诈。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号