首页> 外文期刊>The Washington Quarterly >A Financial Sanctions Dilemma
【24h】

A Financial Sanctions Dilemma

机译:金融制裁困境

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Over the last two decades, there has been a dramatic increase in the popularity of financial sanctions as an instrument of US foreign policy to address security threats ranging from weapons of mass destruction (WMD) proliferation and terrorism to human rights violations and transnational crime. Washington's policymakers have prized these tools for their ability to rapidly apply pressure against foreign targets with few perceived repercussions against American business interests. The problem, however, is that Washington is ignoring a growing tension between financial sanctions designed to support economic statecraft (with non-financial goals) and those designed to protect the international financial system. Confusing the two sends mixed signals to adversaries as well as allies and undermines US credibility and commitment to upholding international banking rules and norms. If Washington cannot reconcile these competing processes, it is unlikely that future administrations will enjoy the same foreign policy levers, leaving the United States at a significant disadvantage.
机译:在过去的二十年中,金融制裁作为美国外交政策的一种手段,其应对诸如大规模杀伤性武器(WMD)扩散和恐怖主义,侵犯人权和跨国犯罪等安全威胁的手段日益普及。华盛顿的政策制定者珍视这些工具,因为它们能够迅速对外国目标施加压力,而对美国商业利益的影响却很小。然而,问题在于,华盛顿忽视了旨在支持经济治国方略(具有非金融目标)的金融制裁与旨在保护国际金融体系的制裁之间日益加剧的紧张关系。混淆这两者会向对手和盟友发出不同的信号,并破坏美国的信誉以及对维护国际银行规则和规范的承诺。如果华盛顿不能调和这些相互竞争的进程,那么未来的政府就不太可能享有相同的外交政策杠杆,使美国处于严重的劣势。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Washington Quarterly》 |2020年第4期|57-71|共15页
  • 作者

    Aaron Arnold;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard Kennedy School's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs US Department of Defense and US Justice Department;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号