首页> 外文期刊>The Serials Librarian >Annals of Library and Information Studies: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Journal and a Comparison with the Top Library and Information Studies Journals in Asia and Worldwide (2011-2017)
【24h】

Annals of Library and Information Studies: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Journal and a Comparison with the Top Library and Information Studies Journals in Asia and Worldwide (2011-2017)

机译:图书馆和信息研究中的历史:与亚洲和世界各地的顶级图书馆和信息研究期刊的学习分析(2011-2017)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article presents a thorough bibliometric analysis of research published in Annals of Library and Information Studies (ALIS), an India-based journal, for the period 2011 -2017. Specifically, it compares this journal's trends with those of other library and information science (LIS) journals from the same geographical area (India, and Asia as a whole) and with the 10 highest-rated US journals worldwide. The source of the data used was the multidisciplin-ary database Scopus. To perform this comparison, ALIS' production was analyzed in order to identify authorship patterns; for example, authors' countries of residence, co-authorship trends, and collaboration networks. Research topics were identified through keyword analysis, while performance was measured by examining the number of citations articles received. This study provides substantial information. The research lines detected through examining the keywords in ALIS articles were determined to be similar to those for the top LIS journals in both Asia and worldwide. Specifically, ALIS authors are focusing on metrics, bibliometrics, and social networking, which follows global trends. Notably, however, collaboration among Asia-based journals was found to be lower than that in the top-indexed journals in the LIS field, showing lesser internationalization. The results obtained present a roadmap for expanding the research in this field.
机译:本文介绍了2011年至2017年期刊的图书馆和信息研究(ALIS)史册(ALIS)的研究中发表的研究彻底的研究。具体而言,它将本杂志与其他图书馆和信息科学(LIS)从同一地理区域(印度和亚洲整体)的信息的趋势进行了比较,并在全球的10个最高评价的美国期刊中。使用的数据来源是MultiDicipiplin-Ary数据库Scopus。为了进行这种比较,分析了Alis的生产,以识别作者模式;例如,作者的居住国,共同作者趋势和协作网络。通过关键词分析确定了研究主题,而通过检查收到的文章数量来衡量性能。本研究提供了大量信息。通过检查ALIS文章中的关键字检测到的研究线被确定为类似于亚洲和全球顶级期刊的关键字。具体而言,Alis作者专注于遵循全球趋势的指标,毕因素质和社交网络。然而,特别是,发现基于亚洲的期刊之间的合作低于LIS领域的顶级期刊,展示了较低的国际化。得到的结果存在于扩展该领域的研究的路线图。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号