...
首页> 外文期刊>The Engineer >Privatisation pitch: in with the old train designs and out with the new
【24h】

Privatisation pitch: in with the old train designs and out with the new

机译:私有化间距:采用旧火车设计,采用新火车

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I refer to the statement that 'successive governments have relied too heavily on the financial and service sector at the expense of manufacturing', expressed by Lord Kumar Bhattacharyya in the Viewpoint in the 26 October issue.rnThere is one area where this has become increasingly problematic, exacerbated through privatisation, and that is the UK's railway system: one that is the most expensive in Europe and yet remains way behind many of our continental neighbours.rnThrough a surge of privatisation, we have a number of organisations wishing to make a profit. In addition, as we no longer have British companies making trains for Britain in Britain, the finance-driven decision to just purchase what is needed against a specification means that we no longer have the full engineering design, development and design verification process in place.
机译:我指的是Kumar Bhattacharyya勋爵在10月26日刊《观点》中发表的声明,即“成功的政府过于依赖金融和服务业而牺牲了制造业”。rn在一个领域中,这变得越来越成问题由于私有化而加剧,这就是英国的铁路系统:这是欧洲最昂贵的铁路系统,但仍落后于我们许多大陆邻国。通过私有化的迅猛发展,我们有许多组织希望获利。此外,由于我们不再有英国公司在英国为英国制造火车,因此,由财务驱动的决定只是根据规格购买了所需的东西,这意味着我们不再具有完整的工程设计,开发和设计验证流程。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Engineer》 |2009年第7783期|16|共1页
  • 作者

    Andrew Porter;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号