首页> 外文期刊>The China quarterly >Relational Repression in China: Using Social Ties to Demobilize Protesters
【24h】

Relational Repression in China: Using Social Ties to Demobilize Protesters

机译:中国的关系压迫:利用社会纽带遣散抗议者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Chinese local officials frequently employ relational repression to demobilize protesters. When popular action occurs, they investigate activists' social ties, locate individuals who might be willing to help stop the protest, assemble a work team and dispatch it to conduct thought work. Work team members are then expected to use their personal influence to persuade relatives, friends and fellow townspeople to stand down. Those who fail are subject to punishment, including suspension of salary, removal from office and prosecution. Relational repression sometimes works. When local authorities have considerable say over work team members and bonds with protesters are strong, relational repression can help demobilize protesters and halt popular action. Even if relational repression does not end a protest entirely, it can limit its length and scope by reducing tension at times of high strain and providing a channel for negotiation. Often, however, as in a 2005 environmental protest in Zhejiang, insufficiently tight ties and limited concern about consequences creates a commitment deficit, partly because thought workers recognize their ineffectiveness with many protesters and partly because they anticipate little or no punishment for failing to demobilize anyone other than a close relative. The practice and effectiveness of relational, "soft" repression in China casts light on how social ties can demobilize as well as mobilize contention and ways in which state and social power can be combined to serve state ends.
机译:中国地方官员经常利用关系镇压来遣散示威者。当民众采取行动时,他们将调查维权人士的社会关系,找到可能愿意阻止抗议活动的人,组建工作团队并派遣其进行思想工作。然后,工作团队成员应利用自己的个人影响力说服亲戚,朋友和同乡镇压。失败者将受到惩罚,包括停薪,罢免和起诉。有时会抑制关系。当地方当局对工作组成员有很大的发言权并且与抗议者的联系牢固时,关系压制可以帮助遣散抗议者并制止民众行动。即使关系压制不能完全结束抗议,它也可以通过减少紧张局势下的紧张局势并提供谈判渠道来限制其抗议的时间和范围。但是,经常会发生这样的情况,例如在2005年浙江的一次环境抗议活动中,关系不够紧密和对后果的担忧有限,这会导致承诺赤字,部分原因是思想工作者意识到他们对许多抗议者的无能,并且部分原因是他们期望因未能遣散任何人而受到很少甚至没有惩罚除了近亲。关系式“软”压制在中国的实践和有效性,揭示了社会纽带如何复员和动员争论,以及将国家和社会力量结合起来为国家服务的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号