...
首页> 外文期刊>The China quarterly >State-Led Urbanization in China: Skyscrapers, Land Revenue and 'Concentrated Villages'
【24h】

State-Led Urbanization in China: Skyscrapers, Land Revenue and 'Concentrated Villages'

机译:中国主导的城市化:摩天大楼,土地收入和“集中村庄”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article examines the rationale behind municipal and local governments' pursuance of urbanization, and the political and socio-economic implications of the policy to move villagers from their farmland into apartment blocks in high-density resettlement areas, or "concentrated villages." It provides evidence of an increasing reliance by municipal and local governments on land revenues and the financing of urban infrastructure by the governments' land-leasing income. Following their relocation to apartment blocks, villagers complain that their incomes fall but their expenditures rise. Moreover, although they cede rights to the use of their farmland to the government, they are not given access to the state-provided social welfare to which urban residents are entitled. The paltry compensation which they receive for their land is insufficient to sustain them. Displaced or landless peasants are emerging as a distinctly disadvantaged societal group, deprived of the long-term security of either farmland or social welfare. The question of whether or not rural land rights should be freely traded is not as crucial to the future livelihoods of landless peasants as allowing them access to the full range of social welfare afforded to urban residents.
机译:本文研究了市政府和地方政府追求城市化的基本原理,以及将村民从农田转移到高密度移民区或“集中村”的公寓楼的政策的政治和社会经济意义。它提供了证据,表明市政府和地方政府越来越依赖于土地收入,而政府的土地出让收入对城市基础设施的融资也越来越多。搬到公寓楼后,村民抱怨说他们的收入下降了,但支出却增加了。此外,尽管他们将使用耕地的权利移交给政府,但他们没有获得城镇居民有权获得的国家提供的社会福利。他们获得的土地微不足道的补偿不足以维持他们的生活。流离失所或失地农民正在成为一个处境特别不利的社会群体,被剥夺了长期耕地或社会福利的保障。农村土地权利是否应该自由交易的问题,对让失地农民的未来生计而言,并不像允许他们获得为城市居民提供的全面社会福利那样重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号