首页> 外文期刊>The army lawyer >Revisiting United States v. Allen: Applying Civilian Pretrial Confinement Credit for Unrelated Offenses Against Court-Martial Sentences to Post-Trial Confinement Under 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b)(2)
【24h】

Revisiting United States v. Allen: Applying Civilian Pretrial Confinement Credit for Unrelated Offenses Against Court-Martial Sentences to Post-Trial Confinement Under 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b)(2)

机译:重审美国诉艾伦(Allen):根据18 U.S.C.适用于针对法庭军事判决的无关罪行的民事审前拘押信用证,适用于审判后拘禁。 §3585(b)(2)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Administrative sentence credit for pretrial confinement is a relatively modern concept in military law. Before the Court of Military Appeals (CMA) issued its 1984 opinion in United States v. Allen, military accused were not automatically entitled to credit for the time they lawfully spent in jail awaiting their trials by court-martial. Unlike in the federal civilian system, where "credit for lawful pretrial detention is regarded as a matter 'of legislative grace[,] and not a [C]onstitutional guarantee,'" neither the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) nor the Manual for Courts-Martial (MCM) provide for credit for lawful pretrial confinement.
机译:审前监禁的行政判刑是军事法中一个相对较新的概念。在军事上诉法院(CMA)在美国诉艾伦(Allen v。Allen)案中发表1984年意见之前,军事被告没有合法地合法地花费在监狱里等待军事法庭审判的时间。与联邦民用系统不同,在联邦民用系统中,“将合法审前拘留的信用视为'立法宽限期[,],而不是[C]体制保证',”《统一军事法典》(UCMJ)或《手册》军事法庭(MCM)为合法的审前羁押规定了信誉。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The army lawyer》 |2008年第8期|p.1-30|共30页
  • 作者

    Michael L. Kanabrocki;

  • 作者单位

    Army Special Operations Command, Fort Bragg, N.C.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 军事;
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号