首页> 外文期刊>The architects' journal >The future of financial markets and regulation: what strategy for Europe?
【24h】

The future of financial markets and regulation: what strategy for Europe?

机译:金融市场和监管的未来:欧洲采取什么策略?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - This article aims to provide insight into the future of financial markets and regulation in order to define what would be the best strategy for Europe. Design/methodology/approach - First the authors define the potential changes in financial markets and then the tools available for the regulator to tame them. Finally, they build five scenarios according to the main evolutions observed on the financial markets and on the tools used by the regulator to modify these trends. Findings - Among the five scenarios defined, two present highly unstable features since the regulator refuses to choose between financial opening and independently determining how to regulate finance in order to preserve financial stability. Three of them achieve financial stability. However, they are more or less efficient or feasible. In terms of market efficiency, the multi-polar scenario is the best and the fragmentation scenario is the worst, since gains of integration depend on the size of the new capital market. Regarding sovereignty of regulation, fragmentation is the best scenario and the multi-polar scenario is the worst, because it necessitates coordination at the global level which implies moving further away from respective national preferences. However, the more realistic option seems to be the regionalisation scenario: this level of coordination seems much more realistic than the global one; the market should be of sufficient size to enjoy substantial benefits of integration. Nevertheless, the "European government" might gradually increase the degree of financial integration outside Europe in line with the degree of cooperation with the rest of the world. Originality/value - Foresight studies on financial markets and regulation are quite rare. This may be explained by the difficulty to forecast what will be their evolution in the coming decades, not least because finance is fundamentally unstable. This paper provides a framework to consider what could be the best strategy of regulators in such an unstable environment.
机译:目的-本文旨在提供对金融市场和监管未来的见解,从而确定什么是欧洲最佳策略。设计/方法/方法-作者首先定义了金融市场的潜在变化,然后定义了可供监管机构使用的工具。最后,他们根据在金融市场上观察到的主要变化以及监管机构用来修改这些趋势的工具,建立了五种情景。调查结果-在所定义的五种情况中,两种表现出高度不稳定的特征,因为监管机构拒绝在金融开放和独立确定如何监管金融以保持金融稳定之间做出选择。其中三个实现了财务稳定。但是,它们或多或少是有效的或可行的。就市场效率而言,多极化方案是最好的,而分散化方案是最坏的,因为整合的收益取决于新资本市场的规模。关于监管主权,分散的情况是最好的情况,多极化的情况是最坏的情况,因为这需要在全球一级进行协调,这意味着要进一步远离各自的国家优惠。但是,更现实的选择似乎是区域化方案:这种协调水平似乎比全球协调水平现实得多;市场应具有足够的规模,以享受整合的实质性好处。尽管如此,“欧洲政府”可能会根据与世界其他国家的合作程度逐步提高欧洲以外的金融一体化程度。原创性/价值-关于金融市场和监管的前瞻性研究非常少见。这可能是由于很难预测未来几十年内它们的发展将是如何解释的,尤其是因为金融从根本上来说是不稳定的。本文提供了一个框架,用于考虑在这种不稳定的环境中监管者的最佳策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号