首页> 外文期刊>The architects' journal >Architects reject government plans for garden cities
【24h】

Architects reject government plans for garden cities

机译:建筑师拒绝政府对园林城市的计划

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Architects have hit out at emerging government plans for a fresh wave of garden cities, warning new development should focus on existing brownfield sites. Following weeks of speculation, communities secretary Eric Pickles admitted on Sunday (19 January) that the government may build 'a garden city or two' - where there is local support. But the news has been met with scepticism by the profession, with many claiming a return to Ebenezer Howard-style, self-contained communities surrounded by green belt was 'outdated' and would not help tackle the huge housing shortage. Stride Treglown's Dominic Eaton said: 'The whole garden city idea is very emotive, promising leafy suburbs and a quality of life of a bygone age that is not relevant to the way we live today. If [these proposals] involve the use of green belt I would be absolutely opposed to the idea.'
机译:建筑师们对新兴的花园城市浪潮的新兴政府计划大吃一惊,警告说新的发展应该集中在现有的棕地上。经过数周的猜测,社区秘书埃里克·皮克斯(Eric Pickles)在周日(1月19日)承认,政府可能会在当地支持下建造“一两个花园城市”。但是,这一消息引起了业内人士的怀疑,许多人声称,回到绿化带包围的埃比尼泽·霍华德(Ebenezer Howard)风格,自给自足的社区“已经过时”,无助于解决巨大的住房短缺。 Stride Treglown的多米尼克·伊顿(Dominic Eaton)说:“整个花园城市的想法非常令人激动,充满希望的绿荫成荫的郊区和过时的生活质量与我们今天的生活方式无关。如果(这些建议)涉及使用绿化带,我将绝对反对这一想法。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号