首页> 外文期刊>Technology and Culture >'Not Quite So Freely as Air'
【24h】

'Not Quite So Freely as Air'

机译:“不像空气那么自由”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the early twentieth century, a rhetoric of freedom developed around networked electricity in North America, providing opportunities and challenges for industrializing states to define their responsibilities to their citizens. Vibrant forums within and between industrializing nations ranged widely over whether electricity was a right or a privilege-and where and for whom. Policymakers questioned whether the proper role for government was to provide public tax-funded electricity, to regulate the private sector, or to guide infrastructure development through targeted financing. These debates became particularly fierce over the role of electricity in eliminating disparities between urban and rural lifestyles. This paper traces the development of electrification programs in Ontario, Canada, and the rural United States as intentionally divergent outcomes of a transnational dialogue. In doing so, it explores early public interventions in electrification as experiments in governance.
机译:二十世纪初期,围绕北美的联网电力发展了自由的言论,这为工业化国家确定对公民的责任提供了机遇和挑战。在工业化国家内部和国家之间充满活力的论坛广泛讨论了电力是权利还是特权,以及在何处以及为谁服务。决策者质疑政府的适当职责是提供公共税收资助的电力,规范私营部门,还是通过有针对性的融资来指导基础设施建设。关于电力在消除城乡生活方式之间的差异方面的作用,这些争论变得尤为激烈。本文追溯了安大略省,加拿大和美国农村地区电气化计划的发展,这是跨国对话的故意分歧结果。在此过程中,它探索了早期的电气化公共干预,作为治理方面的实验。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Technology and Culture》 |2020年第1期|71-108|共38页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位

    Harvard Grad Sch Design Urban Planning & Design Cambridge MA 02138 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号