首页> 外文期刊>Technology and Culture >Sound Clash: Listening to American Studies
【24h】

Sound Clash: Listening to American Studies

机译:声音冲突:听美国研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This anthology, originally conceived as a special issue of American Quarterly, the journal of the American Studies Association, is part of a growing sound-studies literature dedicated to the premise that sound can function not only as an object of study, but also as the cornerstone of a coherent methodology for cultural inquiry. As such, this collection represents a valuable contribution to the field, both in terms of the individual works of scholarship it contains, as well as the collective theoretical vision that emerges from their juxtaposition. "In the West," the editors observe, "choosing to study sound has always been choosing to take the silver. Vision has traditionally been linked to reason, knowledge, science, truth and rationality; sound is 'seen' as fleeting and ephemeral, mystical, subjective and contingent. The former gives you evidence, the latter only hearsay" (p. 2). In re-casting this epistemological marginalization as a strength rather than a weakness, the editors argue that sound-based methodologies offer a point of view that is at once systematic and intrinsically anti-hegemonic.
机译:这本选集最初被视为美国研究协会(American Studies Association)杂志《美国季刊》(American Quarterly)的特刊,它是不断发展的声音研究文学的一部分,致力于使声音不仅可以作为研究对象,而且可以文化研究连贯方法学的基石。这样一来,无论是从其所包含的个人学术著作,还是从并列形成的集体理论视野来看,该收藏品都对该领域做出了宝贵的贡献。编辑们观察到,“在西方,选择学习声音一直是我们的选择。传统上,视觉与理性,知识,科学,真理和理性联系在一起;声音被视作短暂而短暂的事物,神秘的,主观的和偶然的。前者为您提供证据,后者只是传闻”(第2页)。在将这种认识论边缘化重塑为优势而非劣势时,编辑们认为,基于声音的方法论提供了一种观点,该观点既是系统性的,又是本质上是反霸权的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Technology and Culture》 |2014年第3期|736-737|共2页
  • 作者

    JOSEPH SCHLOSS;

  • 作者单位

    City University of New York;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号