...
首页> 外文期刊>Technology and Culture >From Natural Monopoly to Public Utility Technological Determinism and the Political Economy of Infrastructure in Progressive-Era America
【24h】

From Natural Monopoly to Public Utility Technological Determinism and the Political Economy of Infrastructure in Progressive-Era America

机译:从自然垄断到公用事业技术决定论与进步时代的基础设施政治经济学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In present-day debates regarding telecommunication policy, one frequently hears the terms natural monopoly and public utility. This article investigates the origins of these ideas, finding that Richard T. Ely a celebrated American economist of the late nineteenth century-embedded in the term "natural monopoly" a narrative of technological determinism. By arguing that certain services had monopolizing tendencies hardwired into them, Ely argued for their regulation. Ely's theory of natural monopoly formed the basis of Wisconsin's 1907 public utilities law, which served as a model for many other states' regulatory policies. The modern notion of public utility thus carries with it the technological determinism of Ely's natural monopoly idea. By tracing the lineage of these two terms, this article recaptures the influence that activists and progressive politicians exercised over the formation of large technological systems during the Second Industrial Revolution.
机译:在有关电信政策的当今辩论中,人们经常听到自然垄断和公共事业这两个术语。本文研究了这些思想的起源,发现十九世纪末期著名的美国经济学家理查德·E·伊利(Richard T. Ely)将“自然垄断”一词包含在技术决定论的叙述中。通过争论某些服务已经垄断了它们的垄断倾向,Ely主张对其进行监管。伊利的自然垄断理论构成了威斯康星州1907年公共事业法的基础,该法律成为许多其他州的监管政策的典范。因此,现代公用事业概念带有伊利自然垄断思想的技术决定论。通过追溯这两个术语的沿袭,本文回顾了第二次工业革命期间激进主义者和进步的政治家对大型技术系统的形成所施加的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Technology and Culture》 |2016年第4期|806-830|共25页
  • 作者

    Plaiss Adam;

  • 作者单位

    Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL 60208 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号