首页> 外文期刊>Technology analysis & strategic management >Just how difficult can it be counting up R&D funding for emerging technologies (and is tech mining with proxy measures going to be any better)?
【24h】

Just how difficult can it be counting up R&D funding for emerging technologies (and is tech mining with proxy measures going to be any better)?

机译:算上新兴技术的研发资金有多困难(而且采用代理措施的技术采矿会更好吗?)?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Decision makers considering policy or strategy related to the development of emerging technologies expect high quality data on the support for different technological options in order to track trends and allocate resources. A natural starting point would be R&D funding statistics. This paper explores the limitations of such aggregated data in relation to the substance and quantification of funding for emerging technologies. Using biotechnology as an illustrative case, we test the utility of a novel taxonomy to demonstrate the endemic weaknesses in the availability and quality of data from public and private sources. Using the same taxonomy, we consider the extent to which tech-mining presents an alternative, or potentially complementary, way to determine support for emerging technologies using proxy measures such as patents and scientific publications. We find that using proxy measures provides additional visibility of technological emergence and suggest these are a useful complement to financial data.
机译:考虑与新兴技术发展相关的政策或策略的决策者希望获得有关支持不同技术选择的高质量数据,以便跟踪趋势和分配资源。一个自然的出发点将是研发资金统计。本文探讨了这些汇总数据相对于新兴技术的资金实质和量化的局限性。以生物技术为例,我们测试了新型分类法的效用,以证明公共和私人来源的数据的可用性和质量上的地方性弱点。使用相同的分类法,我们考虑技术采矿在多大程度上呈现出替代或潜在的补充方式,以使用专利和科学出版物等代理手段确定对新兴技术的支持。我们发现使用代理指标可提供技术新兴性的更多可见性,并建议这些指标可作为财务数据的有用补充。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号