首页> 外文期刊>Systematic Biology >Simultaneously Mapping and Superimposing Landmark Configurations with Parsimony as Optimality Criterion
【24h】

Simultaneously Mapping and Superimposing Landmark Configurations with Parsimony as Optimality Criterion

机译:使用简约作为最佳性标准同时映射和叠加地标配置

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

All methods proposed to date for mapping landmark configurations on a phylogenetic tree start from an alignment generated by methods that make no use of phylogenetic information, usually by superimposing all configurations against a consensus configuration. In order to properly interpret differences between landmark configurations along the tree as changes in shape, the metric chosen to define the ancestral assignments should also form the basis to superimpose the configurations. Thus, we present here a method that merges both steps, map and align, into a single procedure that (for the given tree) produces a multiple alignment and ancestral assignments such that the sum of the Euclidean distances between the corresponding landmarks along tree nodes is minimized. This approach is an extension of the method proposed by Catalano et al. (2010. Phylogenetic morphometrics (I): the use of landmark data in a phylogenetic framework. Cladistics. 26:539–549) for mapping landmark data with parsimony as optimality criterion. In the context of phylogenetics, this method allows maximizing the degree to which similarity in landmark positions can be accounted for by common ancestry. In the context of morphometrics, this approach guarantees (heuristics aside) that all the transformations inferred on the tree represent changes in shape. The performance of the method was evaluated on different data sets, indicating that the method produces marked improvements in tree score (up to 5% compared with generalized superimpositions, up to 11% compared with ordinary superimpositions). These empirical results stress the importance of incorporating the phylogenetic information into the alignment step.
机译:迄今为止,提出的用于在系统发生树上绘制界标构型的所有方法都始于通过不利用系统发生信息的方法所产生的比对,​​通常是将所有构型与共有构型重叠。为了适当地将沿树的地标配置之间的差异解释为形状变化,为定义祖先分配而选择的度量标准也应构成叠加配置的基础。因此,我们在这里提出了一种方法,该方法将映射和对齐这两个步骤合并为一个过程(对于给定的树),该过程生成多个对齐和祖先分配,从而沿树节点的相应地标之间的欧几里得距离之和为最小化。这种方法是Catalano等人提出的方法的扩展。 (2010.系统发育形态计量学(I):在系统发育框架中使用地标数据。Cladistics。26:539–549)使用简约性作为最佳标准来映射地标数据。在系统发育学的背景下,这种方法可以最大程度地实现共同祖先可以解释地标位置的相似性。在形态计量学的上下文中,此方法可确保(不考虑启发式)在树上推断出的所有变换都代表形状的变化。在不同的数据集上评估了该方法的性能,表明该方法在树分数上产生了显着的提高(与广义叠加相比提高了5%,与普通叠加相比提高了11%)。这些经验结果强调了将系统发育信息纳入比对步骤的重要性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Systematic Biology》 |2012年第3期|p.392-400|共9页
  • 作者

    P. A. Goloboff;

  • 作者单位

    Fundación Miguel Lillo, Miguel Lillo 251, 4000 S.M. de Tucumán, Argentina;

    E-mail:;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号