首页> 外文期刊>Survey methodology >Growth Rates Preservation (GRP) temporal benchmarking: Drawbacks and alternative solutions
【24h】

Growth Rates Preservation (GRP) temporal benchmarking: Drawbacks and alternative solutions

机译:增长率保存(GRP)时间基准:缺点和替代解决方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Benchmarking monthly or quarterly series to annual data is a common practice in many National Statistical Institutes. The benchmarking problem arises when time series data for the same target variable are measured at different frequencies and there is a need to remove discrepancies between the sums of the sub-annual values and their annual benchmarks. Several benchmarking methods are available in the literature. The Growth Rates Preservation (GRP) benchmarking procedure is often considered the best method. It is often claimed that this procedure is grounded on an ideal movement preservation principle. However, we show that there are important drawbacks to GRP, relevant for practical applications, that are unknown in the literature. Alternative benchmarking models will be considered that do not suffer from some of GRP's side effects.
机译:在许多国家统计局中,通常将月度或季度序列作为年度数据的基准。当在不同的频率下测量同一目标变量的时间序列数据时,就会出现基准问题,并且需要消除子年度值的总和与其年度基准之间的差异。文献中提供了几种基准测试方法。保留增长率(GRP)基准程序通常被认为是最佳方法。通常认为,此过程基于理想的运动保留原理。但是,我们表明,GRP存在与实际应用相关的重要缺点,这在文献中是未知的。将考虑不存在GRP某些副作用的替代基准测试模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号