首页> 外文期刊>Studies in Philosophy and Education >The Point of Scientificity, the Fall of the Epistemological Dominos, and the End of the Field of Educational Administration
【24h】

The Point of Scientificity, the Fall of the Epistemological Dominos, and the End of the Field of Educational Administration

机译:科学的观点,认识论的多米诺的衰落和教育管理领域的终结

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The point of scientificity, or pos,represents a place in history whereeducational administration was founded as ascience. A pos creates a field of memoryand a field of studies. A pos isepistemologically sustained in its claim forscientific status by a line of demarcation orlod. A lod is supported by truthclaims based on various forms ofcorrespondence. As these forms have beeninterrogated and abandoned, correspondence hasgiven way to coherentism and finally to testsof falsification. As falsification has shownto contain serious flaws when compared to theactual history of scientific discoveries, theentire project of a distinct and unitaryfield known as educational administration isseriously cast into doubt. Contemporaryexaminations in educational administrationdiscourse show that even when the lod hasbeen undermined by epistemological shifts, theinitial pos has remained to supportclaims regarding the project of a ``science ofleadership.'' The analysis contained in thisarticle show, however, that when claims of thelod are demonstrably unsustainable, theinitial pos must be similarly abandoned. With that collapse the concept of a fieldis likewise effaced. The epistemologicalalternative is to envision fields ofstudy which do not require a lod, excepton a longitudinal basis to ascertain whether aresearch program shaped and sustained by it isprogressive or regressive. In short, there areno aprori meta-criteria to separate sciencefrom non-science in educationaladministration.
机译:科学的观点(pos)代表了历史上的教育管理被确立为科学的地位。 POS创建一个记忆领域和一个研究领域。 POS通过一系列界线在科学上主张其在科学上是根据医学的观点。根据各种形式的信件,以真理为根据支持某项。随着这些形式的被质疑和抛弃,对应关系为连贯性和伪造的检验提供了途径。与科学发现的真实历史相比,证伪已经显示出严重的缺陷,因此,一个被称为教育行政管理的独特统一的领域的整个项目引起了人们的极大怀疑。教育行政话语的当代考试表明,即使当上位主义受到认识论转变的破坏时,最初的位置仍然可以支持有关“领导科学”项目的主张。但是,本文所包含的分析表明,当上位论的主张得到证明时在不可持续的情况下,初始位置必须同样被丢弃。随着这种崩溃,领域的概念也同样消失了。认识论的替代方法是设想不需要领域的研究领域,除非纵向确定研究程序所形成和维持的研究程序是进步的还是回归的。简而言之,在教育管理中没有将科学与非科学区分开的无条件元标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号