首页> 外文期刊>Studies in Philosophy and Education >NOHL, DURKHEIM, AND MEAD: THREE DIFFERENT TYPES OF “HISTORY OF EDUCATION”
【24h】

NOHL, DURKHEIM, AND MEAD: THREE DIFFERENT TYPES OF “HISTORY OF EDUCATION”

机译:诺伊尔,杜肯和米德:“教育历史”的三种不同类型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Historiography of education is not only a question of construction but also of selection. In 19th century “history of education” was typically a genre of “great educators”, mostly male and only marginally female. This construct is influential up to now, at least in popular contexts of educational reasoning. The article discusses in the introductory section problems of selection of names and meanings within history of education, and then three types of historiographical writing that are not only concerned with “great educators” but have larger Philosophical impact. The first type is Herman Nohl’s history of German progressive education, the second one is Emile Durkheim’s history of Higher Education in France, and the third one is George Herbert Mead’s Movements of Thought in 19th Century. The article compares them and discusses their implications for further development of historical writing in education.
机译:教育史学不仅是建构的问题,也是选择的问题。在19世纪,“教育史”通常是一种“伟大的教育者”,主要是男性,而女性则很少。到目前为止,至少在教育推理的流行语境中,这种构想具有影响力。本文在引言部分中讨论了教育历史中名称和含义的选择问题,然后讨论了三种类型的史学著作,它们不仅与“伟大的教育者”有关,而且对哲学的影响更大。第一种是赫尔曼·诺尔(Herman Nohl)的德国先进教育史,第二种是埃米尔·迪尔克海姆(Emile Durkheim)在法国的高等教育史,第三种是乔治·赫伯特·米德(George Herbert Mead)的19世纪思想运动。本文对它们进行了比较,并讨论了它们对教育历史写作的进一步发展的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号