首页> 外文期刊>Safundi: The Journal of South African and American Studies >Writing Spaces: Fiction and Non-Fiction in South Africa
【24h】

Writing Spaces: Fiction and Non-Fiction in South Africa

机译:写作空间:南非的小说与非小说

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The boundary has been a profound presence in South African writing as it has been in its history, yet in conceptual terms it has often been misconstrued as denoting an absolute limit. This essay, written as a contribution to a debate on fiction and non-fiction in South Africa, argues for a different construction. Here the boundary is a spacea??a space of crossing, navigation, danger, creationa??and the essay explores its construction in one of its seminal moments of contention, the debates around Gordimer and Coetzee in the 1980s. Taking a personal tack, I challenge Coetzeea??s view, as expressed in a??The Novel Todaya??, that historical criticism of the time saw literature only as a a??supplementa?? to history. Equally, in views dominant today, there is a disregard for certain forms of writing that are construed as only a??secondarya??, a version of a??non-fictiona??. Either-or binaries such as this, however, produce self-defeating category errors: that history equals non-fiction, that non-fiction equals history, that fiction equals non-history. Rather, I argue for a more expansive viewa??a view that might engage with the fact that both Gordimer and Coetzee produced their most resounding work at overlapping times in the 1970s and 1980s. Writing of many different kinds has disrupted the surface of the real in South Africa, just as the real has disrupted the surface of its writing. In the current period, this might explain some of the energies and exchanges between fiction and non-fiction, whether in the work of Steinberg, Vladislavi??, or van Niekerk. South Africa criticism too should be concerned with writing spacesa??its intricacies, complexities, possibilities.View full textDownload full textKeywordsCoetzee, Gordimer, South African fiction, South African non-fiction, the boundary in South Africa, a??The Novel Todaya??, Vladislavi??, Marlene van NiekerkRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17533171.2011.642588
机译:从历史上看,这个边界一直是南非文学中的一个深刻的存在,但从概念上讲,它常常被误解为表示绝对极限。这篇文章是对南非关于小说和非小说的辩论的贡献而写的,它主张一种不同的解释。这里的边界是一个空间-一个穿越,航行,危险,创造的空间-这篇文章是在其开创性的争论之一——1980年代围绕戈迪默尔和库切的辩论中-探讨其建构的。我以个人立场向库切亚的观点提出挑战,正如《今日小说》中所表达的那样,当时对历史的批评只将文学视为一种“补充”。历史。同样,在当今占主导地位的观点中,对某些写作形式的忽视也被认为仅仅是“中学”,即“非小说”的一种形式。但是,诸如此类的二进制文件都会产生自欺欺人的类别错误:历史等于非小说,非小说等于历史,小说等于非历史。相反,我主张一种更宽泛的观点,这种观点可能与戈迪默尔和库兹在1970年代和1980年代的重叠时期创作出最响亮的作品有关。正如南非已经破坏了其表面的书写一样,许多不同种类的书写也破坏了南非的表面。在当前时期,这也许可以解释小说和非小说之间的某些能量和交流,无论是在斯坦伯格,弗拉迪斯拉夫还是范·尼克尔克的作品中。南非的批评也应该关注写作空间-它的复杂性,复杂性和可能性。查看全文下载全文关键词库兹,戈迪默,南非小说,南非非小说,南非的边界,《今日小说》? ?,弗拉迪斯拉夫??? “ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17533171.2011.642588

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号