...
首页> 外文期刊>Structural Safety >Comparison of probabilistic methods for the effects of wind direction on structural response
【24h】

Comparison of probabilistic methods for the effects of wind direction on structural response

机译:风向对结构应答影响的概率方法比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper compares three methods for predicting extreme wind-load effects on buildings, allowing for the varying direction of the wind, as well as the windspeed itself. These are the 'out-crossing', 'multi-sector' and 'direct calculation' methods. Wind-tunnel data from a generic tall building, assumed to be located in Melbourne, Australia, at eight different orientations to the climate, have been used to assess the methods, and to compare the results with direct calculation of base moments. The out-crossing method gives reasonable results for about half the building orientations, but underpredicts the responses when the dominant northerly wind direction is not the major contributor to the response calculations. The multi-sector approach although slightly conservative for predictions at low values of average recurrence interval (ARI), is accurate for all responses examined at high values of ARI.
机译:本文比较了三种方法来预测建筑物的极端风力负荷效应,允许风的不同方向,以及风速本身。这些是“交叉”,“多部门”和“直接计算”方法。来自普通高层建筑的风洞数据,假设在澳大利亚墨尔本位于澳大利亚的墨尔本,以八个不同的方向,用于评估这些方法,并将结果与​​基准时刻的直接计算进行比较。过交叉的方法为建筑方向的约一半提供了合理的结果,但在主导的北风方向不是响应计算的主要贡献者时,对响应的响应。多扇区方法虽然略微保守平均复发间隔(ARI)的低值(ARI),但对于在ARI的高值下检查的所有反应是准确的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号