...
首页> 外文期刊>Structural engineering international >IABSE Task Group 3.1 Benchmark Results. Part 1: Numerical Analysis of a Two-Degree-of-Freedom Bridge Deck Section Based on Analytical Aerodynamics
【24h】

IABSE Task Group 3.1 Benchmark Results. Part 1: Numerical Analysis of a Two-Degree-of-Freedom Bridge Deck Section Based on Analytical Aerodynamics

机译:IABSE任务组3.1基准结果。 第1部分:基于分析空气动力学的两自由度桥梁剖面的数值分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

IABSE Task Group 3.1 has the mandate to define reference results for the validation of methodologies and programs used to study both stability and buffeting responses of long-span bridges. To this end, the working group set up a benchmark procedure consisting of several steps with increasing complexity to define reference results useful for this validation. The simplest step (1.1a) was presented in Part?1. In this paper (Part 2), the contributions and reference results of the second sub-step (1.1c) are discussed. It consists of the simulation of the aeroelastic response of a three-degree-of-freedom bridge deck section forced by turbulent wind, using experimental aerodynamic coefficients measured in a wind tunnel. The increase in complexity, compared to the previous step, involves the experimental definition of unsteady force coefficients that are defined in a limited range of reduced velocities, and inclusion of the lateral motion and horizontal turbulent wind velocity components. Comparison of the different outputs, obtained by Task Group 3.1 participants with the same input data, is presented, revealing differences that are not always negligible. Moreover, the increase in complexity of the test case results in larger spreads of the results compared to the fully analytical case, analysed in Part?1.
机译:IABSE任务组3.1授权定义验证方法和程序用于研究长跨度桥梁的稳定性和频率的方案的参考结果。为此,工作组设置由几个步骤组成的基准程序,随着越来越复杂的复杂性来定义可用于此验证的参考结果。最简单的步骤(1.1a)部分是部分?1。在本文(第2部分)中,讨论了第二子步骤(1.1C)的贡献和参考结果。它包括模拟通过在风洞中测量的实验空气动力学系数来模拟湍流的三维自由度桥甲板部分的空气弹性响应。与前一步骤相比,复杂性的增加涉及在有限范围的速度范围内限定的不稳定力系数的实验定义,并包括横向运动和水平湍流风速分量。通过任务组3.1具有相同输入数据的参与者获得的不同输出的比较,揭示了并不总是可以忽略不计的差异。此外,与完全分析案例相比,测试壳体复杂性的增加导致结果的较大差异,部分?1分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号