...
首页> 外文期刊>Structural concrete >Comparing test methods for the mechanical characterization of fiber reinforced concrete
【24h】

Comparing test methods for the mechanical characterization of fiber reinforced concrete

机译:纤维增强混凝土力学性能测试方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Different tests are proposed by international standards for the evaluation of the mechanical properties of fiber reinforced concrete (FRC); among them, either beams or round determinate panels are generally used. However, different tests are accepted by design codes if reliable correlation factors between standard parameters are provided (fib Model Code 2010). Within this context, a broad experimental program on both beams and round determinate panels was carried out in order to provide a critical discussion on material characterization and to evaluate possible correlation factors. Beam tests according to European (EN 14651), American (ASTM 1609), and Japanese (JCI-SF4) standard, as well as small round panels and large round panels (according to ASTM 1550) were studied within an experimental program comprising 189 beams and 90 round panels. Unlike previous researches, mainly focused on steel fibers, two types of macro-synthetic fibers were considered. Based on these experimental results, a comparison between test methods is presented, along with correlation approaches are proposed and critically discussed.
机译:国际标准针对纤维增强混凝土(FRC)的机械性能提出了不同的测试方法。其中,通常使用横梁或圆形测定板。但是,如果在标准参数之间提供了可靠的相关系数,设计规范将接受不同的测试(fib型号代码2010)。在这种情况下,对横梁和圆形测定板都进行了广泛的实验程序,目的是对材料表征进行重要讨论并评估可能的相关因素。在包含189个光束的实验程序中研究了根据欧洲(EN 14651),美国(ASTM 1609)和日本(JCI-SF4)标准进行的光束测试,以及小型圆形面板和大型圆形面板(根据ASTM 1550)和90个圆形面板。与以往的研究主要集中在钢纤维上不同,本文考虑了两种类型的宏观合成纤维。基于这些实验结果,提出了测试方法之间的比较,并提出了相关方法并进行了严格讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号