...
首页> 外文期刊>Strategic Management Journal >CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, INVESTMENT BANDWAGONS AND OVERCAPACITY: AN ANALYSIS OF THE WORLDWIDE PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRY, 1975-95
【24h】

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, INVESTMENT BANDWAGONS AND OVERCAPACITY: AN ANALYSIS OF THE WORLDWIDE PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRY, 1975-95

机译:公司治理,投资组合和产能过剩:1975-95年全球石化行业分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Previous research has provided conflicting arguments and evidence on which corporate governance system―bank based or market based―is better in preventing managers from investing in value-destroying projects. This paper attempts to further the debate by comparing the effect of these different corporate governance systems on preventing capacity expansion bandwagon behavior in the worldwide petrochemical industry in the period 1975-95. Our study shows, first, that neither system is particularly effective in curbing overinvestment; however, the market-based system seems to be less ineffective than the bank-based system. Second, free cash flow appears to drive greater bandwagon behavior in the market-based system than in the bank-based system. Finally, within the bank-based system, companies that rely on one bank-shareholder are more likely to join the bandwagon than those with more than one.
机译:先前的研究提供了相互矛盾的论据和证据,证明哪种公司治理系统(基于银行或基于市场)在防止经理人投资破坏价值的项目上更好。本文试图通过比较这些不同的公司治理体系对防止1975-95年间全球石化行业产能扩张浪潮行为的影响来进一步辩论。我们的研究表明,首先,这两种制度都不能有效地抑制过度投资。但是,基于市场的系统似乎没有基于银行的系统低效。其次,与基于银行的系统相比,自由现金流似乎在以市场为基础的系统中驱动更大的潮流。最后,在以银行为基础的系统中,依赖一个银行股东的公司比那些拥有一个以上股东的公司更有可能加入这一潮流。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号