...
首页> 外文期刊>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment >Assessment of arsenic and heavy metal pollution and ecological risk in inshore sediments of the Yellow River estuary, China
【24h】

Assessment of arsenic and heavy metal pollution and ecological risk in inshore sediments of the Yellow River estuary, China

机译:黄河口近岸沉积物中砷,重金属污染及生态风险评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In order to investigate the pollution levels, sources and ecological risks of arsenic (As) and heavy metals (Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Pb and Cd) in inshore sediments of the Yellow River estuary, the surface sediment in areas of inshore coastal waters were sampled in October 2014 as the flow-sediment regulation project (FSRP) was implemented for 13 years. Results showed that the concentrations of As and heavy metals in inshore sediments of the Yellow River estuary were in the order of Zn Cr Cu Ni Pb As Cd. Higher levels of As, Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn and Pb generally occurred in fine-grained sediments of the Yellow River estuary and the southeast region, which was consistent with the spatial distribution of clay. In contrast, higher concentrations of Cd were generally observed in northwest area of the Yellow River estuary and near the Qingshuigou estuary, which showed similarly spatial distribution with that of sand. The sediment quality guidelines (SQG(S)) and geoaccumulation indices (I (geo) ) indicated that the inshore sediments were polluted by Cu, Cd, As, Pb and Zn, and, among them, Cd pollution was more serious. Ecological risk indices (E (r) (i) ) demonstrated low risks for Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Pb and As, and high potential toxicity by Cd. The integrated ecological risk index implied that 6.8% of stations presented moderate risk, 4.5% of stations exhibited disastrous risk, and 88.7% of stations demonstrated considerable risk. Principal component analysis indicated that Ni, Cu, Zn, Pb and As might originate from common pollution sources, while Cr and Cd might share another similar sources. With the continuous implementation of FSRP, As and heavy metal levels in inshore sediments of the Yellow River estuary could be classified as stage I (2002-2010) and stage II (2010-2014). In the stage I, As, Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn and Pb levels fluctuated but decreased significantly, whereas Cd concentrations showed little variation. In the stage II, As and heavy metal levels significantly increased although some little fluctuations occurred. The continuous accumulation of As and heavy metals (especially for Cd) in inshore sediments of the Yellow River estuary would occur again as the FSRP was implemented for 9 years (since 2010). The ecotoxicological risk of Cd, As, Ni and Cu in inshore sediments might be more serious since the accumulation of the four elements would be continuously occurred in future years. Next step, there will be long-term potential consequences for marine organism if effective measures are not taken to control the loadings of metal pollutants into estuary.
机译:为了调查黄河口近岸沉积物,近海沿岸地区表层沉积物中砷(As)和重金属(Cr,Ni,Cu,Zn,Pb和Cd)的污染水平,来源和生态风险随着流动沉淀物调节项目(FSRP)的实施,该水域于2014年10月进行了13年的采样。结果表明,黄河口近岸沉积物中砷和重金属的含量顺序为锌>铬>铜>镍>铅>砷>镉。黄河口及东南地区的细颗粒沉积物中一般会出现较高水平的砷,铬,镍,铜,锌和铅,这与粘土的空间分布是一致的。相反,在黄河口西北部和清水沟口附近普遍观察到较高的Cd浓度,其空间分布与沙子相似。沉积物质量准则(SQG(S))和地质累积指数(I(geo))表明,近岸沉积物受到Cu,Cd,As,Pb和Zn的污染,其中Cd污染更为严重。生态风险指数(E(r)(i))表明Cr,Ni,Cu,Zn,Pb和As的风险较低,而Cd的潜在毒性较高。综合生态风险指数表明,有6.8%的站点具有中等风险,有4.5%的站点具有灾难性风险,而88.7%的站点具有相当的风险。主成分分析表明,Ni,Cu,Zn,Pb和As可能源自共同的污染源,而Cr和Cd可能具有其他相似的污染源。随着FSRP的不断实施,黄河口近岸沉积物中的砷和重金属含量可分为第一阶段(2002-2010年)和第二阶段(2010-2014年)。在第一阶段,砷,铬,镍,铜,锌和铅的含量波动但显着下降,而镉的浓度变化很小。在第二阶段,尽管几乎没有波动,但砷和重金属的含量显着增加。自FSRP实施9年以来(自2010年起),黄河口近岸沉积物中砷和重金属(尤其是镉)的连续积累将再次发生。由于这四种元素的积累在未来几年中会不断发生,因此近岸沉积物中Cd,As,Ni和Cu的生态毒理风险可能会更加严重。下一步,如果不采取有效措施控制河口金属污染物的含量,将对海洋生物造成长期的潜在后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号