首页> 外文期刊>Space policy >The Moon Village and Space 4.0: The 'Open Concept' as a New Way of Doing Space?
【24h】

The Moon Village and Space 4.0: The 'Open Concept' as a New Way of Doing Space?

机译:月亮村与太空4.0:“开放概念”是一种新的太空创作方式?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article discusses the Moon Village concept within the context of the increasing momentum to return human beings to the surface of the Moon. The article follows a dual objective. Firstly, the Moon Village is probably the most misunderstood among the plethora of ideas to explore the Moon scientifically and commercially. The article is therefore intended to explore what the Moon Village actually is. Secondly, the article explores the strengths and weaknesses of the Moon Village. The article is divided into three sections. The first section reviews the current Moon projects of public and private space actors, including the United States, Russia, China, SpaceX and Blue Origin. It sets the scene for the argument that the Moon Village has entered global discourse on space within a positive political environment. The second section discusses the premises of ESA chief Jan Warner's Moon Village concept, putting forward that the Moon Village is intended as an open concept rather than as a concrete plan. It is a process rather than a project and it is meant to initiate a global conversation on humanity's future on the Moon. As such, the world cafe is an appropriate metaphor to illustrate the idea behind the Moon Village. In the third and final section a SWAT/PEST analysis is conducted to assess the feasibility of the Moon Village, highlighting that one of the major opportunities of the project is to promote international cooperation. The article concludes by supporting the institutionalist hypothesis that the Moon Village is arguably a translation of the ESA system to the global level, as participation is voluntary and as it builds on the strengths of each cooperation partner. As such, the Moon Village in indeed a new way of doing space on the global level. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文在使人类重返月球表面的势头越来越大的背景下讨论了月亮村的概念。本文遵循双重目标。首先,月球村可能是在科学和商业上探索月球的众多想法中最被误解的地方。因此,本文旨在探讨月亮村的实际含义。其次,文章探讨了月亮村的优缺点。本文分为三个部分。第一部分回顾了公共和私人空间参与者(包括美国,俄罗斯,中国,SpaceX和Blue Origin)当前的Moon项目。它为“月亮村”已经进入一个积极的政治环境中的全球空间论辩提供了论据。第二部分讨论了欧空局局长扬·华纳(Jan Warner)的“月亮村”概念的前提,并提出了“月亮村”是一个开放概念,而不是一个具体计划。这是一个过程,而不是一个项目,它的目的是在月球上发起有关人类未来的全球对话。因此,世界咖啡馆是一个恰当的比喻,用以说明月亮村背后的想法。在第三部分(也是最后一部分)中,进行了SWAT / PEST分析,以评估月亮村的可行性,并强调该项目的主要机遇之一是促进国际合作。文章最后以支持制度主义的假设作为结论,即月亮村可以说是ESA系统向全球范围的转换,因为参与是自愿的,而且建立在每个合作伙伴的优势之上。因此,月亮村确实是一种在全球范围内进行太空活动的新方式。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号