首页> 外文期刊>Solar Energy >Comparison of hydrogen storage with diesel-generator system in a PV-WEC hybrid system
【24h】

Comparison of hydrogen storage with diesel-generator system in a PV-WEC hybrid system

机译:PV-WEC混合系统中储氢与柴油发电机系统的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Hydrogen as a storage medium in renewable energy systems has been the subject of various studies in recent years. Such a system consists of a long-term and a short-term storage system. In a battery, energy is stored for short term whereas the electrolyser, H{sub}2-tank and fuel cell combination is used for long-term energy storage to increase the reli-ability of supply. The same purpose can be achieved by introducing a diesel generator instead of long-term storage. The advantage of such a system is that it needs low investment cost. However, the main disadvantage is that it needs to supply fuel for the operation of the generator. The advantage of hydrogen-based long-term storage over a diesel generator is that it does not need any supply of fuel. In photovoltaic-wind-diesel hybrid systems, the surplus energy during the good season is not stored. In the present study, the possible sites for renewable applications are specified depending on the seasonal renewable energy variation and fuel cost at the site of application. The critical fuel cost is calculated depending on the seasonal solar and wind energy difference. The actual fuel cost at the site of application is compared with critical fuel cost. To find out the actual fuel cost at the location of application, the transportation cost is also included. If the actual fuel cost is higher than the critical fuel cost, the location is cost-effective for hydrogen-based storage. Otherwise, the site is suitable for a diesel-generator backup system. It is found that at present hydrogen storage is not cost-effective compare to a diesel-generator-based system. In the near future when the target cost of the electrolyser and the fuel cell is achieved, the scope of the hydrogen-based storage system will also increase and it will also be cost competitive with diesel-generator system for remote applications.
机译:近年来,氢作为可再生能源系统中的存储介质已成为各种研究的主题。这样的系统由长期和短期存储系统组成。在电池中,能量是短期存储的,而电解槽,H {sub} 2-tank和燃料电池的组合则用于长期能量存储,以提高供电的可靠性。通过引入柴油发电机代替长期存放,可以达到相同的目的。这种系统的优点是它需要低的投资成本。但是,主要缺点是需要为发电机的运行提供燃料。与柴油发电机相比,氢长期存储的优势在于它不需要任何燃料。在光伏-风-柴油混合系统中,不存储好季节期间的剩余能量。在本研究中,根据季节性可再生能源变化和应用地点的燃料成本,指定了可再生应用的可能地点。关键燃料成本是根据季节性太阳能和风能差异计算的。将应用地点的实际燃料成本与关键燃料成本进行比较。为了找出应用地点的实际燃料成本,还包括运输成本。如果实际燃料成本高于关键燃料成本,则该位置对于基于氢的存储而言具有成本效益。否则,该站点适用于柴油发电机备用系统。已经发现,与基于柴油发电机的系统相比,目前的储氢不是成本有效的。在不久的将来,当达到电解槽和燃料电池的目标成本时,基于氢的存储系统的范围也将扩大,并且与远程应用的柴油发电机系统相比,其成本竞争力也将大大提高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号