首页> 外文期刊>Software and systems modeling >'No shit' or 'Oh, shit!': responses to observations on the use of UML in professional practice
【24h】

'No shit' or 'Oh, shit!': responses to observations on the use of UML in professional practice

机译:“不该死”或“哦,该死!”:对在专业实践中使用UML的观察结果的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper follows a paper, "UML in Practice" presented at ICSE 2013. It summarizes and reflects on the discussion and additional investigation that arose from "UML in Practice." The paper provides a condensed recap of "UML in Practice" findings, explains what data were collected from which sources to inform this paper, and describes how the data were analyzed. It reports on the discussion that has arisen, summarizing responses from industry practitioners, academics teaching software engineering, and the UML community, and considers how those responses reflect on the original observations. The responses to "UML in Practice" divide (crudely) between two perspectives: (1) the observations made are familiar and unsurprizing, and match personal experience ("No shit"); or (2) the observations threaten long-held beliefs about UML use, and in particular about the status of UML as the de facto standard of software engineering, implying a need to change personal practice ("Oh, shit!").
机译:本文是继在ICSE 2013上发表的论文“ UML in Practice”之后进行的。它总结并反思了“ UML in Practice”引起的讨论和其他调查。本文简要总结了“ UML in Practice”的发现,解释了从哪些来源收集了哪些数据来为本文提供信息,并描述了如何分析这些数据。它报告了已经进行的讨论,总结了行业从业人员,教授软件工程的学者和UML社区的反馈,并考虑了这些响应如何反映原始观察结果。对“实践中的UML”的回答(粗略地)分为两个观点:(1)所观察到的内容是熟悉且毫不奇怪的,并且与个人经验相匹配(“不废话”);或(2)这些观察结果威胁着人们对UML使用的长期信念,尤其是关于UML作为软件工程事实上的标准的地位,这意味着需要改变个人习惯(“哦,该死!”)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号