首页> 外文期刊>Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society >Policy, Preferences, and Patriarchy: The Division of Domestic Labor in East Germany, West Germany, and the United States
【24h】

Policy, Preferences, and Patriarchy: The Division of Domestic Labor in East Germany, West Germany, and the United States

机译:政策,偏好和父权制:东德,西德和美国的家庭劳动分工

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Individual agency observed in the gendered division of labor is shaped by structural factors, but only recently has evidence emerged that the effect of women’s resources varies systematically in its sociopolitical context. Here we use the 1994 International Social Survey Program to assess whether the relative effect of a proxy for women’s and men’s preferences—hallmark of individual choice—varies as well across three countries with divergent historical policy approaches regarding the private sphere. East German socialist policies required and supported women’s employment; West German policy promulgated a male breadwinner model, and U.S. policy primarily remains silent on the private sphere. The division of domestic tasks and relative strength of individual preferences on shifting it vary by region. In the former East Germany the division of domestic labor is more egalitarian and the effect of preferences is small but equal for the genders. In West Germany the division is more traditional and preference effects are greater, but gender differences in these are insignificant. The U.S. division of domestic task falls between the two German regions, and the gender difference in preference effects is the greatest, with U.S. men’s preferences predicting significantly more variance than do U.S. women’s. Consequently, allowing the market to dominate does not yield equal strength of preferences in the individual-level models used to predict the division of domestic tasks. This supports the dual-system feminist claims that capitalism can exacerbate nonmarket patriarchal hierarchies.
机译:在性别分工中观察到的个体机构是由结构因素决定的,但直到最近才有证据表明,妇女资源的影响在其社会政治背景下发生了系统性变化。在这里,我们使用1994年国际社会调查计划来评估代理人的偏好(作为个人选择的标志)的相对影响是否在三个国家以及针对私有领域采用不同历史政策方法的国家之间有所不同。东德社会主义政策要求并支持妇女的就业;西德政策颁布了一个男性养家糊口的模式,而美国政策主要在私人领域保持沉默。家庭任务的划分和个人偏好转移的相对强度因地区而异。在前东德,家务劳动的分配更加平等,优惠的影响虽小,但对男女平等。在西德,这种划分更为传统,偏好影响更大,但是性别差异并不明显。美国的家务劳动分工介于两个德国地区之间,并且在偏好效果上的性别差异最大,而美国男性的偏好预测比美国女性的差异大得多。因此,在用来预测家庭任务划分的个人级别模型中,让市场支配并不能产生相同的偏好强度。这支持了双重制度的女权主义主张,即资本主义可以加剧非市场性的父权制等级制度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号