...
首页> 外文期刊>Social Epistemology >Ideational Social Capital and the Civic Culture: Extricating Putnam's Legacy from the Social Capital Debates
【24h】

Ideational Social Capital and the Civic Culture: Extricating Putnam's Legacy from the Social Capital Debates

机译:概念性社会资本与公民文化:从社会资本之争中解脱普特南的遗产

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Robert Putnam's work was a double-edged sword for social capital scholars. It brought unprecedented attention to the research agenda but also created conceptual confusion. Many scholars have tried to disentangle Coleman's concept of social capital from what some described as Putnam's “fuzzy psychological notion” of civic culture values. Despite the rigour of these efforts, Putnam's influence remains, because scholars and policy makers are drawn to the benefits his work promised. This article takes a different tack, and seeks to extricate Putnam's early ideas from the social capital debates by offering an alternate theorization of his original findings. It returns to Making Democracy Work and argues that Putnam mis-stepped when he took the rational choice route and invoked Coleman's concept of social capital. It takes an ideational approach to explaining civic culture. The resulting “ideational social capital” suggests a different research agenda, which just might deliver on Putnam's early promise.
机译:罗伯特·普特南(Robert Putnam)的作品对社会资本学者来说是一把双刃剑。它给研究议程带来了前所未有的关注,但也造成了概念上的混乱。许多学者试图将科尔曼的社会资本概念与普特南关于公民文化价值观的“模糊心理学概念”相混淆。尽管采取了这些严格的措施,但普特南的影响力仍然存在,因为学者和决策者都从他的工作所承诺的利益中获得了吸引力。本文采取了不同的方法,试图通过提供普特南最初发现的替代理论,从社会资本辩论中解脱出来。它回到使民主运转起来,并论证了普特南在采取理性选择路线并援引科尔曼的社会资本概念时走错了一步。它采用概念方法来解释公民文化。由此产生的“理想的社会资本”提出了不同的研究议程,这可能会实现普特南的早期承诺。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号