...
首页> 外文期刊>Smart and sustainable built environment >Material eco-efficiency indicators for Brazilian buildings
【24h】

Material eco-efficiency indicators for Brazilian buildings

机译:巴西建筑的物质生态效率指标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to propose a set of lifecycle-based indicators to describe material eco-efficiency of buildings normalized per unit of gross floor area (GFA), and at verifying feasibility of their calculation for building materials and components, based upon four case studies. The paper also examines the effects that discrepancies between two carbon footprint accounting methods (embodied CO_2 (ECO_2) vs embodied CO_(2e)) have on communication of environmental performance of selected materials. Design/methodology/approach - The lifecycle assessments (LCAs) were performed through LCA support platform SimaPro 7.3. Data for materials/components production cycle modeling were collected from primary and secondary data from national literature or adapted from Ecoinvent database. Embodied energy, ECO_2, blue water footprint (bWF), non-renewable content and volatile organic compound emissions (VOCe) indicators were calculated from lifecycle inventory (LCI) outputs, while embodied CO_(2e). was calculated using CML 2001 v.2.01 impact assessment method. Findings - Obtained results suggest that a core database comprised of 12 materials and components - cement, ceramic blocks, steel rebar, sawn timber planks, PVC tubes, plywood, PVC conduits, roof steel structure, roundwood, ceramic tiles, hydrated lime and adhesive mortar - provides a very reasonable description of a building's embodied energy (99.63 percent), embodied CO_(2e)(97.50 percent), bWF (96.26 percent), non-renewable content (97.53 percent) and VOCe (95.38 percent) profiles. Except for bWF of cement and concrete, substantial reductions in the metrics' values captured environmental advantages of partially substituting ground granulated blast furnace slag (ggbs) for clinker Portland. Originality/value - The disclosure of embodied energy and carbon, as well as of other environmental performance data at whole-building level (per unit of GFA) pointed out in this paper, allows comparability and helps to establish performance goals and benchmarks and to guide policy decisions. Following a coordinated methodological outline, future works are expected to evolve to gradually constitute a LCI database that enables the use of the proposed metrics and of LCA as decision-making tools in the building sector.
机译:目的-本文的目的是提出一套基于生命周期的指标,以描述按建筑总面积(GFA)标准化的建筑物的材料生态效率,并验证其计算建筑材料和组件的可行性。根据四个案例研究。本文还研究了两种碳足迹核算方法(具体的CO_​​2(ECO_2)与具体的CO_​​(2e))之间的差异对所选材料的环境绩效沟通的影响。设计/方法/方法-生命周期评估(LCA)通过LCA支持平台SimaPro 7.3进行。材料/组件生产周期建模的数据是从国家文献的主要和次要数据中收集的,或者是从Ecoinvent数据库改编而来的。从生命周期清单(LCI)输出中计算出体现的能量,ECO_2,蓝色水足迹(bWF),不可再生含量和挥发性有机化合物排放(VOCe)指标,同时体现为CO_(2e)。使用CML 2001 v.2.01影响评估方法计算。研究结果-获得的结果表明,一个核心数据库包含12种材料和成分-水泥,陶瓷块,钢筋,锯材木板,PVC管,胶合板,PVC导管,屋顶钢结构,圆木,瓷砖,熟石灰和砂浆-对建筑物的内在能量(99.63%),内在CO_(2e)(97.50%),bWF(96.26%),不可再生含量(97.53%)和VOCe(95.38%)特性进行了非常合理的描述。除了水泥和混凝土的bWF外,指标值的大幅降低体现了用磨碎的高炉矿渣(ggbs)部分代替熟料硅酸盐的环境优势。原创性/价值-本文所指出的在整体建筑层面(单位GFA单位)内含的能量和碳以及其他环境绩效数据的披露,具有可比性,有助于建立绩效目标和基准并提供指导政策决定。按照协调的方法论纲要,预期未来的工作将逐步发展,以逐步构成一个LCI数据库,该数据库可将拟议的指标和LCA用作建筑行业的决策工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号