...
首页> 外文期刊>Scientometrics >Key Labs and Open Labs in the Chinese scientific research system: Their role in the national and international scientific arena
【24h】

Key Labs and Open Labs in the Chinese scientific research system: Their role in the national and international scientific arena

机译:中国科研体系中的重点实验室和开放实验室:它们在国内外科学领域中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Chinese science has developed rapidly over the latest fifteen years. It is said that it is now in a quantitative expansion phase. A series of programmes extending over a period of twenty years has resulted in more than 160 Key Labs and nearly 400 Open Labs at present. The organization and evaluation of this system of labs is one of the strategic measures for scientific resource reorganization in China. The role played by these labs is analysed in this article using data from the Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) and the Science Citation Index (SCI). Nowadays almost one quarter of all internationally oriented Chinese publications originate from these labs. The same is true for citations received by Chinese scientists in the SCI. Comparisons between SCI-based and CSCD-based performance results show that the relative academic impact of Key Labs and Open Labs is more international than domestic. Key Labs have a higher total production and receive more citations than Open Labs. Yet their impact, measured as citations per publication, is very similar. We conclude that when it comes to impact on the international scene, these labs have not yet led to a big step forward for Chinese science as a whole. The fact that in the year 2004 a new evaluation procedure has been put in place means that the Chinese scientific authorities have recognized this fact and are dealing with it.
机译:在最近的十五年中,中国科学发展迅速。据说现在正处于定量扩张阶段。经过长达20年的一系列计划,目前已有160多个重点实验室和近400个开放实验室。该实验室系统的组织与评估是中国科学资源重组的战略措施之一。本文使用中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)和科学引文索引(SCI)的数据分析了这些实验室的作用。如今,将近四分之一的国际化中文出版物都来自这些实验室。中国科学家在SCI中收到的引用也是如此。基于SCI和基于CSCD的性能结果之间的比较表明,重点实验室和开放实验室的相对学术影响比国际影响更大。与Open Labs相比,Key Labs的总产量更高,并且被引用次数更多。但是,它们的影响(以每本出版物的引用数衡量)非常相似。我们得出的结论是,在影响国际舞台时,这些实验室尚未为整个中国科学带来重大进步。 2004年实施了新的评估程序,这意味着中国科学主管部门已经意识到这一事实并正在处理。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Scientometrics》 |2006年第1期|p.3-14|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Documentation and Information Centre of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Science Citation Database, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Zhongguancun, Beijing, 100080, P. R. China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 计量学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号