首页> 外文期刊>Science >Can We Trust The Machines?
【24h】

Can We Trust The Machines?

机译:我们可以信任机器吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Since the 2000 U.S. presidential election, many have worked to increase voters' confidence that election results are fair and correct. One theme from 2000 was that the technology used to record votes-especially punchcard ballots-was deficient and needed to be replaced. The Help America Vote Act of 2002 provided federal funds for states to acquire electronic voting machines or optically scanned paper ballots. New controversy arose when computer scientists and others complained that the recommended technologies were far from being up to the task. The electronic technologies suffered from security weaknesses and production defects, and election officials often administered the new machines incompetently. Critics argued the machines lacked transparency, were unreliable, and were possibly subject to unde-tectable manipulation.
机译:自2000年美国总统大选以来,许多人一直在努力提高选民对选举结果公平,正确的信心。 2000年的一个主题是,用于记录选票的技术(尤其是打孔卡选票)不足,需要替换。 2002年的《帮助美国投票法》为各州提供了联邦资金,用以购买电子投票机或光学扫描的纸票。当计算机科学家和其他人抱怨所推荐的技术远远不能完成任务时,引起了新的争议。电子技术遭受安全漏洞和生产缺陷的困扰,选举官员经常不称职地管理新机器。批评者认为,这些机器缺乏透明度,不可靠,并且可能受到无法检测的操纵。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science》 |2008年第5902期|p.677-678|共2页
  • 作者

    Walter R; Mebane Jr;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Political Science and Department of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Ml 48109-1045, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 自然科学总论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号