...
首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Exposure of stone marten (Mattes foina) and polecat (Mustela putorius) to anticoagulant rodenticides: Effects of regulatory restrictions of rodenticide use
【24h】

Exposure of stone marten (Mattes foina) and polecat (Mustela putorius) to anticoagulant rodenticides: Effects of regulatory restrictions of rodenticide use

机译:石貂(Mattes foina)和鸡貂(Mustela putorius)暴露于抗凝血灭鼠剂中:管制灭鼠剂使用的限制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs) are used to control rodent populations there is also a widespread secondary exposure of non-target predators to ARs. To reduce secondary exposure, regulatory restrictions in AR usage were tightened in Denmark in 2011. The restrictions included die cessation of AR use for plant protection and any use away from buildings, as well as limitations in private consumers' access to ARs. To quantify and evaluate the efficiency of the regulatory measures to reduce secondary exposure, we analysed ARs in liver tissue from 40 stone martens (Mattes foina) and 40 polecats (Mustela putorius) collected before and 31 stone martens and 29 polecats collected after the restrictions were imposed. No declines in the prevalence ARs were detected following the regulatory restrictions in either stone marten (Before: 98%, After: 100%) or polecat (Before: 93%, After: 97%). The total AR concentration was higher in stone martens than in polecats in both sampling periods. Between the two sampling periods, the total AR concentrations in the mustelids increased (P < 0.001). The increase was significant for stone marten (Before: 419 ng/g ww. After: 1116 ng/g ww, P < 0.001), but not for polecat (Before: 170 ng/g ww, After: 339 ng/g ww). Overall, the total AR concentration was positively correlated to the urban area and the area used for Christmas tree production in which ARs were regularly used before 2011. The regulatory restrictions in AR usage did not reduce exposure of non-target stone martens and polecats. The temporal and spatial patterns of AR concentrations in predators indicate that chemical rodent control in and around buildings is the dominant source for the exposure of non-target predators in intensively human-dominated landscapes in Denmark. The results suggest that non-chemical methods for rodents control at buildings are necessary to prevent widespread secondary AR exposure of predators in human modified landscapes.
机译:当使用抗凝血灭鼠剂(ARs)来控制啮齿动物种群时,非目标捕食者还会广泛地二次暴露于ARs中。为了减少二次暴露,丹麦于2011年加强了AR使用方面的监管限制。这些限制包括停止将AR用于植物保护和任何远离建筑物的用途,以及对私人消费者使用AR的限制。为了量化和评估减少次要暴露的监管措施的效率,我们分析了限制条件之前收集的40只石貂(Mattes foina)和40只猫鼬(Mustela putorius)和31只石貂和29只猫鼬在肝脏组织中的ARs。施加。在石貂(之前:98%,之后:100%)或鸡貂(之前:93%,之后:97%)中,根据法规限制,未检测到患病率的下降。在两个采样期间,石貂中的总AR浓度均高于鸡貂。在两个采样周期之间,芥子气中的总AR浓度增加(P <0.001)。石貂的增幅是显着的(之前:419 ng / g重量。之后:1116 ng / g重量,P <0.001),而不是鸡貂(之前:170 ng / g重量,之后:339 ng / g重量) 。总体而言,总AR含量与市区和2011年之前定期使用AR的圣诞树生产区域呈正相关。AR使用的监管限制并未减少非目标石貂和鸡貂的暴露。捕食者中AR浓度的时空格局表明,建筑物内及其周围的化学啮齿动物控制是丹麦人为密集景观中非目标捕食者暴露的主要来源。结果表明,必须采取非化学方法控制建筑物中的啮齿动物,以防止人类改造景观中食肉动物的大量次生AR暴露。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号