首页> 外文期刊>Science and society >On the Misappropriation of Marx's Late Writings on Russia: A Critique of Marx at the Margins
【24h】

On the Misappropriation of Marx's Late Writings on Russia: A Critique of Marx at the Margins

机译:马克思后期著作对俄罗斯的挪用:对马克思的边际批判

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In his late writings, Marx speculated that Russia could bypass the “necessary” stages that had defined the economic history of Western Europe. By appropriating the positive results of capitalism without traversing through the phase of negativity which produced them, the Russian commune, he claimed, could transition directly into communism. Kevin Anderson's Marx at the Margins (Anderson, 2010) defends the mistaken interpretation that Marx extended this possibility to all precapitalist societies that he studied at the time. This sort of “multilinearity” universalizes the path of development open to Russia, understating the historical context and specific social relations which, Marx argued, enabled such a transformation. Aside from its European context, the distinguishing mark of this commune was its “dualism” — a feature that endowed it with greater “historical initiative.”.
机译:马克思在他的晚期著作中推测,俄罗斯可以绕过定义西欧经济历史的“必要”阶段。他声称,通过合理利用资本主义的积极成果而不经过产生负面影响的消极阶段,俄罗斯公社可以直接过渡到共产主义。凯文·安德森(Kevin Anderson)的《边缘的马克思》(Anderson,2010)辩解了一种错误的解释,即马克思将这种可能性扩展到了他当时研究的所有资本主义前社会。这种“多重线性”使向俄罗斯开放的发展道路普遍化,低估了历史背景和特定的社会关系,马克思认为,这种关系促成了这种转变。除了其欧洲背景之外,该公社的显着特征是其“二元论”,这一特征赋予了它更大的“历史主动性”。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science and society》 |2018年第1期|67-93|共27页
  • 作者

    Christopher Araujo;

  • 作者单位

    University of Winnipeg. c.araujo@uwinnipeg.ca;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号