首页> 外文期刊>Science and society >Social Ontology: Recasting Political Philosophy Through a Phenomenology of Whoness
【24h】

Social Ontology: Recasting Political Philosophy Through a Phenomenology of Whoness

机译:社会本体论:通过谁现象学来重塑政治哲学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many years ago Michael Eldred was a co-author of Critique of Competitive Freedom and the Bourgeois-Democratic State: Outline of a Form-Analytic Extension of Marx's Uncompleted System (Kurasje, 1984). While not widely known, this work has greatly influenced a number of Marxian theorists concerned with the methodological framework of Marx's theory and his relationship to Hegelian dialectics. In contrast to the traditional reading according to which Marx's critique of political economy traces a supposed historical transition from simple commodity production to capitalism, Eldred and his co-authors insisted on a systematic reading in which capitalism is the object of investigation from the beginning, with transitions from one level of theoretical abstraction to another justified logically by the immanent contradictionsarising in the former. And in contrast to the traditional view that Marx's critique of political economy moves from a level in which values are calculated in terms of labor times to one in which money prices reign, these authors insisted that money is the only form in which value ever appears. The claims that Marx's theory should be evaluated by the standards of dialectical logic, and that the heart of Marx's position is found in his account of money as the value form, remain controversial. Whatever one's views on these matters, Eldred and his co-authors deserve great credit for their very significant contributions to debates on these and related issues.
机译:许多年前,迈克尔·埃尔德雷德(Michael Eldred)是《竞争自由与资产阶级民主国家的批判:马克思未完成体系的形式分析扩展纲要》(库拉斯,1984年)的合著者。尽管这项工作尚未广为人知,但它极大地影响了许多关注马克思理论方法论框架及其与黑格尔辩证法关系的马克思主义理论家。与马克思对政治经济学的批判追溯从假定的从简单的商品生产到资本主义的历史转变的传统解读相反,埃尔德雷德和他的合著者坚持系统地解读资本主义,从一开始就是研究的对象。从一种理论上的抽象过渡到另一种理论上的内在矛盾,在逻辑上是合理的。与传统的观点相反,马克思对政治经济学的批判从一种以劳动时间来计算价值的水平转变为以货币价格为主导的水平,而这些作者则坚持认为,货币是价值出现的唯一形式。有人认为,马克思的理论应以辩证逻辑的标准来评估,并且马克思的立场的核心是在他的货币账户中作为价值形式而存在的,这一说法仍然存在争议。无论人们对这些问题有何看法,埃尔德雷德和他的合著者都应为在有关这些问题和有关问题的辩论中做出的重要贡献而倍受赞誉。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science and society》 |2010年第4期|P.565-568|共4页
  • 作者

    Tony Smith;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies Iowa State University 453 Catt Hall Ames, Iowa 50011;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号