首页> 外文期刊>Science and Engineering Ethics >Compassion, Ethics, and Neuroscience: Neuroethics Through Buddhist Eyes
【24h】

Compassion, Ethics, and Neuroscience: Neuroethics Through Buddhist Eyes

机译:同情,伦理学和神经科学:通过佛教徒眼神的神经伦理学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As scientists advance knowledge of the brain and develop technologies to measure, evaluate, and manipulate brain function, numerous questions arise for religious adherents. If neuroscientists can conclusively establish that there is a functional network between neural impulses and an individual’s capacity for moral evaluation of situations, this will naturally lead to questions about the relationship between such a network and constructions of moral value and ethical human behavior. For example, if cognitive neuroscience can show that there is a neurophysiological basis for the moral appraisal of situations, it may be argued that the world’s religions, which have traditionally been the keepers and purveyors of ethical values, are rendered either spurious or irrelevant. The questions point up broader dilemmas in the interface between science and religion, and raise concerns about the ethics of neurological research and experimentation. Since human beings will still arbitrate what is “moral” or “ethical,” how can religious perspectives enrich the dialogue on neuroethical issues and how can neuroscience enrich dialogue on religion? Buddhist views on the nature of consciousness and methods of practice, especially meditation practice, may contribute to discussions on neuroscience and theories about the interrelationship between consciousness and ethical awareness by exploring the role that karma, intentionality, and compassion play in Buddhist understandings of the interrelationship between consciousness and ethics.
机译:随着科学家提高对大脑的了解并开发用于测量,评估和操纵大脑功能的技术,宗教信奉者提出了许多问题。如果神经科学家能够最终确定神经冲动与个人对情况进行道德评估的能力之间存在功能网络,那么自然会引发有关这种网络与道德价值和道德人类行为的建构之间的关系的疑问。例如,如果认知神经科学能够证明对情况进行道德评估具有神经生理学基础,则可能会争辩说,传统上一直是道德价值观的维护者和提供者的世界宗教被认为是虚假的或无关紧要的。这些问题指出了科学与宗教之间更广泛的困境,并引起了人们对神经学研究和实验伦理学的关注。由于人类仍将仲裁“道德”或“道德”,宗教观点如何丰富关于神经伦理问题的对话,神经科学如何丰富关于宗教的对话?佛教关于意识本质和实践方法(特别是冥想实践)的观点可能会通过探索业力,意向性和同情心在佛教对相互关系的理解中的作用而有助于有关神经科学和意识与道德意识之间相互关系的理论的讨论。在意识和道德之间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号