首页> 外文期刊>Science & Education >A Critical Reading of Ecocentrism and Its Meta-Scientific Use of Ecology: Instrumental Versus Emancipatory Approaches in Environmental Education and Ecology Education
【24h】

A Critical Reading of Ecocentrism and Its Meta-Scientific Use of Ecology: Instrumental Versus Emancipatory Approaches in Environmental Education and Ecology Education

机译:批判性地解读生态中心主义及其对生态的超科学运用:环境教育和生态教育中的工具与解放方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of the paper is to make a critical reading of ecocentrism and its meta-scientific use of ecology. First, basic assumptions of ecocentrism will be examined, which involve nature’s intrinsic value, postmodern and modern positions in ecocentrism, and the subject-object dichotomy under the lenses of ecocentrism. Then, we will discuss implications for environmental education and ecology education including a contradistinction between the instrumental and the emancipatory approach and the study of socio-scientific issues. An outline of protected areas as a socio-scientific issue, which is informed by the emancipatory approach, will be presented in the final part of the paper.
机译:本文的目的是对生态中心主义及其对生态学的超科学运用进行批判性的解读。首先,将研究生态中心主义的基本假设,其中涉及自然的内在价值,生态中心主义的后现代立场和现代立场,以及生态中心主义视角下的主客二分法。然后,我们将讨论对环境教育和生态教育的意义,包括工具性和解放性方法之间的矛盾以及对社会科学问题的研究。本文的最后部分将介绍作为社会科学问题的保护区的概要,该概要由解放方法提供。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science & Education》 |2013年第6期|1467-1483|共17页
  • 作者

    Tasos Hovardas;

  • 作者单位

    Departments of Primary and Preschool Education University of Thessaly">(1);

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号