首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian Journal of History >Paratexts and Footnotes in Historical Narrative: Henry Biaudet and scholarly and nationalistic ambitions of historical research 1902-1915
【24h】

Paratexts and Footnotes in Historical Narrative: Henry Biaudet and scholarly and nationalistic ambitions of historical research 1902-1915

机译:历史叙事中的文字文字和脚注:亨利·比奥黛(Henry Biaudet)以及历史研究的学术和民族主义野心1902-1915年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article explores how Henry Biaudet (1870-1915) and the Finnish historical expedition in Rome used different paratextual elements in their studies on the Nordic Counter-Reformation. The analysis of paratextual strategies of the expedition suggests that application of paratexts in historical narrative reflected the fundamental characteristics of 19th-century historiography: professionalization, development into a research based independent academic discipline and nationalism. Paratexts, such as titles, title pages, lists of previous research, prefaces and with certain restrictions also footnotes, were first of all important genre indicators, which helped to draw a line between popular and professional historical narrative. Second, paratexts served political aims by helping to create images of scholarship in cases when argumentation was politically biased. Despite the important role paratexts performed in the development of modern historical scholarship via shaping historical narrative, historians have paid surprisingly little attention to them. Hence, the analysis of the paratextual strategies of Biaudet and his expedition offers an interesting perspective to the daily practices, values and thinking of historians at the turn of the 20th century.View full textDownload full textKeywordsparatexts, footnotes, Finnish historiographyRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03468755.2012.709470
机译:本文探讨了亨利·比奥黛(Henry Biaudet,1870-1915年)和芬兰在罗马的历史考察如何在研究北欧反改革时使用不同的超文本元素。对探险队超文本策略的分析表明,超文本在历史叙事中的应用反映了19世纪历史学的基本特征:专业化,发展为基于研究的独立学术学科和民族主义。头文字,例如标题,书名页,以前的研究清单,序言和有一定限制的脚注,首先是所有重要的体裁指标,这有助于在流行和专业的历史叙述之间划清界限。其次,在辩论存在政治偏见的情况下,超文本帮助创造奖学金的形象,从而达到了政治目的。尽管副语素通过塑造历史叙事在现代历史学术发展中发挥了重要作用,但历史学家却很少对此给予关注。因此,对Biaudet及其远征队的超文本策略的分析为20世纪初的历史学家的日常实践,价值观和思想提供了有趣的视角。查看全文下载全文关键词:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more”,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03468755.2012.709470

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号