首页> 外文期刊>Review of Philosophy and Psychology >Insanity, Deep Selves, and Moral Responsibility: The Case of JoJo
【24h】

Insanity, Deep Selves, and Moral Responsibility: The Case of JoJo

机译:精神错乱,深Deep的自我和道德责任:JoJo案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Susan Wolf objects to the Real Self View (RSV) of moral responsibility that it is insufficient, that even if one’s actions are expressions of one’s deepest or “real” self, one might still not be morally responsible for one’s actions. As a counterexample to the RSV, Wolf offers the case of JoJo, the son of a dictator, who endorses his father’s (evil) values, but who is insane and is thus not responsible for his actions. Wolf’s data for this conclusion derives from what she takes to be our “pretheoretic intuitions” about JoJo. As it turns out, though, experimental data on actual pretheoretic intuitions does not seem to support Wolf’s claim. In this paper, we present such data and argue that, at least with respect to this particular objection, the RSV can survive Wolf’s attack intact.
机译:苏珊·沃尔夫(Susan Wolf)反对道德责任的真实自我看法(RSV),认为这是不够的,即即使一个人的行为是一个人最深层或“真实”自我的表达,一个人可能仍不对该行为承担道德责任。作为对RSV的反例,沃尔夫(Wolf)提出了独裁者之子乔乔(JoJo)的案例,乔乔赞同他父亲的(邪恶的)价值观,但他疯了,因此对自己的行为不负责任。沃尔夫得出此结论的数据来自于她对乔荷的“理论直觉”。然而,事实证明,关于实际的理论直觉的实验数据似乎并不支持沃尔夫的主张。在本文中,我们提出了这样的数据,并认为,至少就此特定异议而言,RSV可以在Wolf的攻击中完好无损。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Review of Philosophy and Psychology》 |2010年第3期|p.319-332|共14页
  • 作者

    David Faraci; David Shoemaker;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Philosophy, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, 43403, USA;

    Department of Philosophy and Murphy Institute, Tulane University, 113 Newcomb Hall, New Orleans, LA, 70118, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号