首页> 外文期刊>Review of Philosophy and Psychology >Empathy and Direct Social Perception: A Phenomenological Proposal
【24h】

Empathy and Direct Social Perception: A Phenomenological Proposal

机译:移情和直接的社会感知:现象学的建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Quite a number of the philosophical arguments and objections currently being launched against simulation (ST) based and theory-theory (TT) based approaches to mindreading have a phenomenological heritage in that they draw on ideas found in the work of Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty, Stein, Gurwitsch, Scheler and Schutz. Within the last couple of years, a number of ST and TT proponents have started to react and respond to what one for the sake of simplicity might call the phenomenological proposal (PP). This paper addresses some of these critical responses, and distinguishes—in the process—substantive disagreements from terminological issues and other issues that are symptomatic of different research agendas. It does so by focusing specifically upon some objections made by Pierre Jacob. These epitomize the kinds of concerns that are being raised about PP at the moment, and thus facilitate a reply on behalf of PP that also applies more generally.
机译:目前针对基于模拟(ST)和基于理论-理论(TT)的心智阅读方法提出的许多哲学论点和异议都有一种现象学上的传承,它们借鉴了胡塞尔(Husserl),海德格尔(Heidegger),萨特(Sartre), Merleau-Ponty,Stein,Gurwitsch,Scheler和Schutz。在过去的几年中,许多ST和TT支持者已经开始做出反应并做出响应,为简单起见,人们可能将其称为现象学建议(PP)。本文讨论了其中的一些关键对策,并在此过程中将实质性分歧与术语问题和其他体现不同研究议程的问题区分开来。它通过特别关注Pierre Jacob的一些反对意见来做到这一点。这些概括了当前对PP提出的各种担忧,因此有助于代表PP的答复也同样适用。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Review of Philosophy and Psychology》 |2011年第3期|p.541-558|共18页
  • 作者

    Dan Zahavi;

  • 作者单位

    Center for Subjectivity Research, Department of Media, Cognition and Communication, University of Copenhagen, Njalsgade 140-142, DK-2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号