首页> 外文期刊>Review of Philosophy and Psychology >In Defense of Incompatibility, Objectivism, and Veridicality About Color
【24h】

In Defense of Incompatibility, Objectivism, and Veridicality About Color

机译:捍卫关于颜色的不兼容,客观主义和真实性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Are the following propositions true of the colors: No object can be more than one determinable or determinate color all over at the same time (Incompatibility); the colors of objects are mind-independent (Objectivism); and most human observers usually perceive the colors of objects veridically in typical conditions (Veridicality)? One reason to think not is that the empirical literature appears to support the proposition that there is mass perceptual disagreement about the colors of objects amongst human observers in typical conditions (P-Disagreement). In this article, we defend Incompatibility, Objectivism, and Veridicality by calling into question whether the empirical literature really supports P-Disagreement.
机译:颜色的下列命题是正确的吗:一个对象不能同时具有一种以上可确定或确定的颜色(不兼容);物体的颜色与心灵无关(客观主义);并且大多数人类观察者通常会在典型条件下真实地感知物体的颜色(真实性)?对此不予考虑的原因之一是,经验文献似乎支持这样一种命题,即在典型条件下人类观察者之间对物体的颜色存在普遍的感知分歧(P分歧)。在本文中,我们通过质疑经验文献是否真的支持P分歧来捍卫不兼容,客观主义和真实性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号