首页> 外文期刊>Review of African Political Economy >Ties that bind or binds that tie? India's African engagements and the political economy of Kenya
【24h】

Ties that bind or binds that tie? India's African engagements and the political economy of Kenya

机译:系领带或系领带的领带?印度的非洲参与和肯尼亚的政治经济

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper analyses contemporary non-Western engagement with Africa through the lens of the second most significant, but surprisingly neglected, ‘Asian driver’ - India. Much of the literature on India's renewed interest in Africa is panoramic, highlighting concepts of ‘South-South’ cooperation in ways relatively uncritical of continued Indian claims to the Nehruvian moral high ground in the developing world. This article, by contrast, focuses on critical realities of India's relations with a single country - Kenya, a nation with which India has had ostensibly close links due to the historic presence of South Asian communities in the region. It critiques notions that ‘diasporic’ ties between India and Kenya facilitate contemporary Indian economic ambitions. Rather, the paper argues, fractious historical race relations in Kenya, and the cynosure of ‘African’ homogenisation of ‘Asians’ within an ‘ethnicised’ post-colonial political economy, might partially impede Indian ambitions relative to capital-rich foreign suitors devoid of such historical baggage. The second major argument holds that the specific state-led imperatives of much economic liaison within Kenya today favour certain ‘partners’ with statist investment models in contrast to India's more explicit, but not absolute, private sector-led engagement. Most importantly, analysis within a localised African context points to African agency in encounters with the ‘Asian drivers’, a term implying a certain unidirectional power flow. The competitive interest of a range of ‘new’ suitors has allowed African leaders, not least in Kenya as this paper suggests, unprecedented choice in international negotiations. The danger, however, is that these new liaisons can reify divisive socio-political conflicts in which many African nations are mired. This appears to be pertinent to Kenya where strains within the elite political sphere are being somewhat exacerbated by foreign investment, particularly from China and the Arab world.View full textDownload full textKeywordspolitical economy, international relations, diaspora, investment, India-Africa relations, KenyaRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2010.530944
机译:本文通过第二重要但令人惊讶地被忽略的“亚洲司机”印度来分析当代非西方与非洲的交往。关于印度重新对非洲的兴趣的许多文献都是全景性的,它们以相对不批评印度对发展中国家不断发展的尼赫鲁维亚道德制高点的主张相对不批评的方式,突出了“南南合作”的概念。相比之下,本文着眼于印度与一个国家(肯尼亚)关系的关键现实,肯尼亚由于南亚社区在该地区的历史性存在而在表面上与印度有着密切的联系。它批评了印度和肯尼亚之间的“散居”联系促进了当代印度的经济野心。相反,该论文认为,肯尼亚历史悠久的种族关系破裂,以及在“种族化”的后殖民政治经济中“亚细亚”的“非洲”同质化的态,可能会部分阻止印度的野心。相对于没有此类历史包capital的富裕资本的外国求婚者。第二个主要论点认为,今天肯尼亚内部许多经济联络的由国家主导的特定要求,倾向于某些具有国家主义投资模式的“合作伙伴”,而印度则更加明确但并非绝对地由私人部门主导。最重要的是,在非洲本地化背景下进行的分析指出了与“亚洲司机”相遇时的非洲代理机构,这个术语暗示着一定的单向潮流。一系列“新”求婚者的竞争利益使非洲领导人,尤其是肯尼亚,如本文件所述,成为国际谈判中前所未有的选择。但是,危险在于这些新的联络员可以纠正许多非洲国家陷入困境的分裂性社会政治冲突。这似乎与肯尼亚有关,因为外国投资,特别是来自中国和阿拉伯世界的外国投资在某种程度上加剧了精英政治领域内的压力。查看全文下载全文关键词政治经济,国际关系,侨民,投资,印非关系,肯尼亚相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2010.530944

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号