首页> 外文期刊>Rethinking Marxism >Marx for Medievalists: Rethinking Feudalism and Historicism in Capital
【24h】

Marx for Medievalists: Rethinking Feudalism and Historicism in Capital

机译:马克思为中世纪主义者:对首都的封建制度和历史主义的反思

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article assesses the value of Marx's Capital for medieval historians and literary historicists. The author objects to a widespread interpretation of the Marxian concept of feudal exploitation on the grounds that it introduces an anachronistic notion of ownership. He argues that an approach to historicism closer to that pursued by Marx in Capital would permit more productive scholarly work on medieval history and social justice. He also argues that Capital raises questions about the value of conventional historicism similar to those that are presently of concern to many medievalists.View full textDownload full textKeywordsFeudalism, Property Rights, Medieval, Middle Ages, HistoricismRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2011.536324
机译:本文评估了马克思首都对中世纪历史学家和文学历史学家的价值。作者反对对马克思的封建剥削概念进行广泛的解释,理由是它引入了过时的所有权概念。他认为,接近历史主义的方法接近马克思在《资本论》中所追求的方法,将允许在中世纪历史和社会正义方面进行更有成果的学术著作。他还认为,资本引起了人们对传统历史主义价值的质疑,类似于目前许多中世纪主义者所关注的那些。查看全文下载全文关键词在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2011.536324

著录项

  • 来源
    《Rethinking Marxism》 |2011年第1期|p.12-21|共10页
  • 作者

    Matthew C. Brown;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:08:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号