首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called 'European Paradox'
【24h】

The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called 'European Paradox'

机译:科学,技术及其产业开发之间的关系:通过所谓“欧洲悖论”的神话和现实进行的说明

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper discusses, first, the properties of scientific and technological knowledge and the institutions supporting its generation and its economic applications. The evidence supports the broad interpretation that we call the 'Stanford-Yale-Sussex' synthesis. Second, such patterns yield important implications with respect to the so-called 'European Paradox', i.e. the conjecture that EU countries play a leading global role in terms of top-level scientific output, but lag behind in the ability of converting this strength into wealth-generating innovations. Some descriptive evidence shows that, contrary to the 'paradox' conjecture, Europe's weaknesses reside both in its system of scientific research and in a relatively weak industry. The final part of the paper identifies a few normative implications: much less emphasis should be put on various types of 'networking', and much more on policy measures aimed at strengthening both frontier research and European corporate actors. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:本文首先讨论科学技术知识的性质以及支持其产生和经济应用的机构。证据支持我们称之为“斯坦福大学-耶鲁大学-萨塞克斯大学”综合研究的广泛解释。其次,这种模式对所谓的“欧洲悖论”产生了重要的影响,即欧洲国家在最高科学产出方面发挥着全球领导作用的推测,但在将这种力量转化为能力方面的能力落后创造财富的创新。一些描述性证据表明,与“悖论”猜想相反,欧洲的弱点在于其科研体系和相对薄弱的行业。本文的最后一部分确定了一些规范性含义:应减少对各种类型的“网络”的重视,而应将重点放在旨在加强前沿研究和欧洲公司行为者的政策措施上。 (c)2006 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号